![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
How much speedup over a Core2 has George (et al) achieved
in LL testing? David |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
http://mersenne.org/report_benchmark...ic_cpu=4373214
is an Ivy Bridge, http://mersenne.org/report_benchmark...ic_cpu=2150153 is a core2. Overclocking causes a bit of confusion, but it looks as if a 4096k FFT takes 90ms on the Core2 and 25ms or so on the Ivy Bridge. So a bit over a factor three. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
647410 Posts |
THX Tom.
But does AVX alter the size of FFT needed for a given exponent? D Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2012-05-30 at 11:24 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
194A16 Posts |
To avoid comparing apples with oranges,
how much speedup has AVX made to a given Ivy Bridge? (Sorry for any Oxymorons) D |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Jun 2003
508710 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
Has "memory contention" any relation to AVX?
BTW Don't you agree "bandwidth" is an overworked term? Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2012-05-31 at 19:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jun 2003
5,087 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2·3·13·83 Posts |
Quote:
"Bandwidth" is used in just about ALL contexts these days! Try Googling "bone of contention", or "I used to be a contender". David Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2012-06-01 at 10:48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
When Shannon (dubbed by Turing a poser) asked
von Neumann (he of "no hidden variables" notoriety) what he should call his new term, the reply was: "Call it Entropy. After all nobody understands what that means". I wonder decreasingly as to why Boltzmann topped himself. David |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
Yes; they're too darned fast. With more bandwidth, there would be enough room for all four/whatever cores to talk to mem as necessary, so there wouldn't be any contention.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Orienteering in Oxford | davieddy | Lounge | 20 | 2011-08-21 11:46 |
| Benchmarks | MurrayInfoSys | Information & Answers | 3 | 2011-04-14 17:10 |
| LLR benchmarks | Oddball | No Prime Left Behind | 11 | 2010-08-06 21:39 |
| benchmarks | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 15 | 2009-08-18 16:44 |
| Benchmarks for i7 965 | lavalamp | Hardware | 21 | 2009-01-06 04:32 |