![]() |
|
|
#419 |
|
Sep 2009
2×1,039 Posts |
The list of composites with no known factors, http://factordb.com/listtype.php?t=3 has problems at 71 and 75 digits. wget gets:
Code:
--2019-09-22 17:17:36-- http://factordb.com/listtype.php?t=3&mindig=70&perpage=1&start=4&download=1 Resolving factordb.com (factordb.com)... 116.203.33.155 Connecting to factordb.com (factordb.com)|116.203.33.155|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Internal Server Error 2019-09-22 17:17:37 ERROR 500: Internal Server Error. |
|
|
|
|
|
#420 |
|
"Sam"
Nov 2016
22×34 Posts |
N-1 Proof test has been delayed for several days (maybe it's a system error?):
http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00001362414421 "This number is already in queue for N-1-test." The large N-1 factor can be found here. Thanks to who knows what's going on. BTW, How long would it take to prove a random 20,000 digit prime using N-1? I plan to enter one in the database soon I hope it won't stress out the system any more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#421 |
|
May 2019
Rome, Italy
2316 Posts |
I'm looking for easy N-1 proofs these days, and i noticed this too. Maybe is giving priority in checking Primo certificates, if N-1 has a lot factors? Usually i see dozens of certificates in queue. (it's just a guess, i actually don't know how the db handles its queues).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#422 | |
|
Jun 2003
31·163 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#423 |
|
Aug 2002
3718 Posts |
A 1344-dd number that I certified Saturday has been stuck verifying for around 48 hours at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#424 |
|
Sep 2009
207810 Posts |
(4386^689+2067^1462)/3^689/2705 (4515 digits) submitted by Masaki UKAI is also stuck.
And the load average earlier today was less than 1 so it doesn't look as if they are being processed. Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
#425 |
|
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
13·199 Posts |
Aliquot sequences are not displaying
|
|
|
|
|
|
#426 |
|
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
23·52·13 Posts |
http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000900935563 got a problem.
it is supposed to be prime. |
|
|
|
|
|
#427 | |
|
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
2×877 Posts |
Quote:
This ID is for the expression (10^79-181)%(10^79-1)/9. Can you explain why such an expression was generated? 10^79-181 is less than 10^79-1, so the % operator doesn't actually do anything here. It's the same number as just (10^79-181)/9. Of course, if you query that expression, it shows up as prime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#428 |
|
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
23·52·13 Posts |
I have no idea. it was the 'smallest composite without a factor' at the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#429 | |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
64608 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A suggestion for factordb. | enzocreti | FactorDB | 15 | 2021-06-24 07:15 |
| Extending Factordb | carpetpool | FactorDB | 6 | 2017-01-23 11:04 |
| FactorDB PRP's | smh | FactorDB | 231 | 2015-07-28 02:30 |
| bugged sequence in factordb | firejuggler | Aliquot Sequences | 2 | 2010-06-15 14:03 |
| FactorDB question | Raman | Factoring | 15 | 2010-01-28 10:24 |