![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
647410 Posts |
I'm not good at this.
But when I get an exponent I LL test it to completion. I will P-1 beforehand (if necessary) and ask a friend to TF a few extra bits on their shit hot GPU should it be needed. Why are nearly all LL tests (to date) factored inadequately? Why are there 10s of 1000s of 50M exponents hanging fire waiting for TF???? David |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22×23×107 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Oct 2011
7·97 Posts |
Quote:
The problem though is more complex than a simple explanation. You have to consider 1) number of LL's requested per day 2) number of LL TF's completed per day by GPU72, 3) expiring exponents that are overdue, 4) Primenet's assignment strategy, 5) people who complain that they cannot get the TF's they want cause they are being hoarded and to try and satisfy them hundreds of under TF'd assignment are not picked up, yet due to #4 are again handed out for LL due to the inadequate TF requests by the complainers. The GPU72 project is a huge success, but we are "running at 102 MPH in from of a train running 100 mph" and with all the overdue exponents getting tossed back into the mix, it feels like we are going 75mph and losing ground. Maybe we need to petition George to tweak the assignment rules a bit, but looking at the exponents awaiting TF atm, everything the spider has grabbed under 60M is at 71 bits, so it's getting there. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
11001010010102 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
145128 Posts |
Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2012-05-22 at 14:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2·67·73 Posts |
Quote:
During the same period and range, 6,174 LL tests completed, or 206 per day. So, to use your analogy, if GIMPS is running at 100 mph, then we're running at 300 mph. Besides, at our current 30 day average rate, we'll have TFed everything to the newly appropriate levels below 60M in less than 106 days (assuming we get access to everything currently not LLed, which isn't going to happen, so we'll be effectively finished even sooner). I wonder what davieddy will harp about then? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
19·397 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Oct 2011
7·97 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
194A16 Posts |
Love you George.
Suitable link to follow as soon as it comes to mind. D Edit: A little bit you (Move quick for my age) Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2012-05-22 at 18:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
Quote:
PS Tina Weymouth on bass guitar. Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2012-05-22 at 18:50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3×5×313 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 128-bit OS'es and GIMPS? | ixfd64 | Software | 22 | 2011-10-31 22:23 |
| GIMPS on PS3 | flouran | Hardware | 202 | 2010-04-30 09:06 |
| GIMPS Nub | SayMoi | Information & Answers | 5 | 2009-04-06 15:29 |
| GIMPS uses only 1 cpu | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 7 | 2009-01-10 20:01 |
| Why do you run GIMPS ? | Prime Monster | Lounge | 12 | 2003-11-25 19:04 |