mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-05-14, 06:15   #1
dtyler7
 
May 2012

1 Posts
Default AppCrash with Prime95 v26.6

This crash has now occurred twice on different HP z800 machines
CPU has 6 core at 3.0Ghz (hyperthreaded), 12 workers, 12GB ram
prime95 given 4GB and was running trial factoring

Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: prime95.exe
Application Version: 26.6.1.0
Application Timestamp: 4d9f7bf8
Fault Module Name: prime95.exe
Fault Module Version: 26.6.1.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 4d9f7bf8
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 000000000000938e
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.4
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: cb1a
Additional Information 2: cb1aff9fb1e58ed177e2e97ba0a7cc51
Additional Information 3: 4319
Additional Information 4: 4319cea5aaef44f8ba4980ba70731bdf
dtyler7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-05-14, 19:45   #2
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·29·83 Posts
Default

Sigh... there's probably not much anyone can do, but let's try anyways. What size numbers? 60M? 70M? 800M? What bit ranges? 70->71, or 64->65?

Btw, not really related to the crash, but mem allocation only matters if you're doing P-1 factoring.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-05-14, 19:54   #3
PageFault
 
PageFault's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Dawn of the Dead

23510 Posts
Default

6 cores, 12 workers - that's your problem. Run 6 workers and set the affinity manually to 1 worker per physical core.
PageFault is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-05-14, 19:55   #4
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3×29×83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PageFault View Post
6 cores, 12 workers - that's your problem. Run 6 workers and set the affinity manually to 1 worker per physical core.
That should not cause Prime95 to crash, a priori. With trial factoring, the memory use is limited enough that I don't think there will be any tangible benefit to using one worker per physical core.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Appcrash bcp19 Software 32 2011-12-12 21:59

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:48.


Fri Aug 6 21:48:44 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 16:17, 1 user, load averages: 2.51, 2.40, 2.47

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.