![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
1101110101012 Posts |
LaurV, you appear to work in the hardware business; how many of those boards do you think the OCZ folks would need to sell to get them under, say, $1000 each?
(and I would think you'd have a lot of non-recurring engineering to recoup as well, that PCB looks pretty busy) Last fiddled with by jasonp on 2012-03-08 at 20:45 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
212210 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·1,373 Posts |
Quote:
*edit: because the nand flash has a quite limited number of writings, clever interface circuits will always write in a different physical place, to extend the life of the flash memory. Cheap devices lack that mechanism. Any flash IC usually has some additional sectors (that is, more memory than is specified) used especially for this "relocation" purpose. Some IC's (depending on price) go to 1%, 5% or even 10% more "storage space", which is used only when and after the "main" (normal-accesible) sectors can't be written anymore, this additional memory will automatically "relocate" the defective blocks. Cheap devices lack this too. edit 2: and to answer your question, they should sell under $1k, if it would not be for their proprietary stuff put into it (like HSDL, etc). What I would be interested is the ocz's hybrid stuff (this IS fast, much faster then the non-hybrid one, with 120k IOps, and larger too, with up to 1TB storage), despite of the fact that I can't understand how this can beat a ramdrive, for either, price, speed, etc. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2012-03-09 at 04:36 |
|
|
|
|