![]() |
|
|
#507 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
Whoa. I totally just got assigned literally the first exponent after 45,000,000, which is 45,000,017. I will show up in PrimeNet in around 40 minutes, when the comp does its daily update. (chalsall could probably verify this as well.)
40 minutes later: http://www.mersenne.org/report_expon...&B1=Get+status (It'll be a couple of months though, it's on my new-laptop-that-I-only-recently-got-running.) Also, while I have a post going, I should point out that the sum of the yellow column has been slowly creeping up all night. It was at ~465 like 5 hours ago. We gonna need a lot more P-1. Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2012-02-09 at 06:08 Reason: closeparen |
|
|
|
|
|
#508 |
|
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany
2·5·53 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#509 | |
|
Oct 2011
Maryland
12216 Posts |
Quote:
That is how it goes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#510 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Yeah... Someone (who will remain unnamed but can easily be determined) reserved 6,000 DCTFs...
![]() I've had spidy grab another 2,000 for those who insist on doing DCTF work. But, again, please consider doing LLTF work instead -- that's were we really need the firepower right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#511 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
BTW, you'd asked a while back for the Released Level report to be able to show those who have been released with P-1 completed, and those without. Click on the column headers to switch the views, or from the drop-down menus. And, just to be explicit, not all of those released with P-1 had the P-1 done through the system. Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2012-02-09 at 14:59 Reason: Spelling mistake. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#512 | |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
342110 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#513 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
236568 Posts |
Wow! The last LL-TF factor found here was on 12/24/2012.
There have been quite a few in the DC range, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#514 |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
11·311 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#515 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
But if you take a look at the overall system stats, you'll see that LLTF finds more factors / candidate than DCTF. LLTF: 992 factors for 27,676 candidates. DCTF: 381 factors for 33,303 candidates. Of course, from a per GHz Days of TF effort perspective, this is not true. But then, the savings per LL factor found is much higher. And, at the end of the day, this project was always intended to help GIMPS. Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2012-02-09 at 15:52 Reason: Added last sentence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#516 | |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
Quote:
Would that I had such foresight. I'd be playing the markets and the ponies big time.![]() EDIT: @chalsall: I was just whining, anyway. All work accomplished has value. But with my luck running this way, it's a good thing I'm not playing the stock markets or the ponies! Last fiddled with by kladner on 2012-02-09 at 16:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#517 |
|
Oct 2011
Maryland
2×5×29 Posts |
If TF starts outpacing P-1 and LL, are there any thoughts to lowering the exponent limit for TF to 73? How are we doing compared to the LL wave?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Status | Primeinator | Operation Billion Digits | 5 | 2011-12-06 02:35 |
| 62 bit status | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 27 | 2008-09-29 13:52 |
| OBD Status | Uncwilly | Operation Billion Digits | 22 | 2005-10-25 14:05 |
| 1-2M LLR status | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 2 | 2005-03-13 17:03 |
| Status of 26.0M - 26.5M | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 25 | 2004-06-18 16:46 |