GPU to 72 status... - Page 252

Aramis Wyler · 2014-04-12, 22:48

Interesting, must have been luck of the draw. The 70M numbers (70765103, 70765853) show on gpu72 at 2014-04-12 21:15:53 whereas the other 13 numbers I submitted all showed at 2014-04-12 20:53:38. It's interesting because it was 2 cards, 2 distinct sequential submissions each with 1 70M number at the end, so the first 70M number submitted before 6 of the 69M numbers and the other 70M number was at the end, and yet the first scan picked up all of the 69M numbers and neither of the 70M numbers. It's not important - I'm glad it's working. It must have been some unusual timing with the submissions and the scan.

chalsall · 2014-04-12, 23:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

It's not important - I'm glad it's working. It must have been some unusual timing with the submissions and the scan.

Thanks for the update. And, for the record, I didn't change anything for the "observations" to succeed.

This was probably a timing issue. What I refer to as a "harmonic situation" between autonomous actors; sometimes related to a "race condition", but often different.

But, please, bring any future perceived issues forward publicly. This is a very complicated machine we've communally built -- we all want to find any bugs that exist.

flashjh · 2014-04-13, 15:45

Last night during maintenance on my main system the power supply blew out (including a nice smoke display).

Unfortunately, I don't have the money to continue replacing parts so this system will stay offline. That's ~1400 Ghz/days down.

@Chris: Since I don't have access to the drive now, it will take a few days to know which assignments are stuck on the system. I'll move them to a working system when I can regenerate the work file.

chalsall · 2014-04-13, 16:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashjh

Last night during maintenance on my main system the power supply blew out (including a nice smoke display).

Ah, heck... Sorry to hear of your loss -- it's always sad when the "Magic Blue Smoke" leaks out....

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashjh

@Chris: Since I don't have access to the drive now, it will take a few days to know which assignments are stuck on the system. I'll move them to a working system when I can regenerate the work file.

OK, thanks for the heads up for resource planning.

Thankfully the Cat4 recycling is now happening in earnest (about 600 or so candidates a day on average), so we should still be able to pull ahead again. But if anyone has any additional firepower they can bring to bear in the LL TF range, it would be very appreciated....

James Heinrich · 2014-04-14, 01:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

But if anyone has any additional firepower they can bring to bear in the LL TF range, it would be very appreciated....

In celebration of (unexpectedly) getting a second GTX 670 today, I'll take a break from my usual project and pick up 200 candidates (100 for each 670). Assuming I can run them 24/7 that would be 500GHd/d, but I don't think I can promise that I'll be running 24h/d. Still, it's something.

Uncwilly · 2014-04-14, 01:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

But, please, bring any future perceived issues forward publicly. This is a very complicated machine we've communally built -- we all want to find any bugs that exist.

Minor issue:
When asking for LL-TF work, if I enter a starting number, like say 332190000, GPU72 does not automatically update the previews. It used to. It takes selecting Lowest Exponent (or the like) to get it to update. Don't know if this is feature or not.

kladner · 2014-04-14, 02:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Minor issue:
When asking for LL-TF work, if I enter a starting number, like say 332190000, GPU72 does not automatically update the previews. It used to. It takes selecting Lowest Exponent (or the like) to get it to update. Don't know if this is feature or not.

I have usually found it necessary to click in any other field, after entering data in a particular one, to get the entry to be included. It amounts to a refresh.

Uncwilly · 2014-04-14, 02:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by kladner

I have usually found it necessary to click in any other field, after entering data in a particular one, to get the entry to be included. It amounts to a refresh.

That used to work. I have to click on one of the block of four choices in the drop down.

kracker · 2014-04-14, 02:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Heinrich

In celebration of (unexpectedly) getting a second GTX 670 today, I'll take a break from my usual project and pick up 200 candidates (100 for each 670). Assuming I can run them 24/7 that would be 500GHd/d, but I don't think I can promise that I'll be running 24h/d. Still, it's something.

Nice!

kladner · 2014-04-14, 03:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

That used to work. I have to click on one of the block of four choices in the drop down.

Still seems to work as it was for me. The exception is that, if the drop-down is in the default "WMS" choice, no entry makes any difference except number of assignments.

chalsall · 2014-04-14, 14:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Heinrich

Still, it's something.

Thanks! Every bit helps....

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2014-04-12, 22:48	#2762
Aramis Wyler "Bill Staffen" Jan 2013 Pittsburgh, PA, USA 2³×53 Posts	Interesting, must have been luck of the draw. The 70M numbers (70765103, 70765853) show on gpu72 at 2014-04-12 21:15:53 whereas the other 13 numbers I submitted all showed at 2014-04-12 20:53:38. It's interesting because it was 2 cards, 2 distinct sequential submissions each with 1 70M number at the end, so the first 70M number submitted before 6 of the 69M numbers and the other 70M number was at the end, and yet the first scan picked up all of the 69M numbers and neither of the 70M numbers. It's not important - I'm glad it's working. It must have been some unusual timing with the submissions and the scan.

2014-04-13, 15:45	#2764
flashjh "Jerry" Nov 2011 Vancouver, WA 1,123 Posts	Last night during maintenance on my main system the power supply blew out (including a nice smoke display). Unfortunately, I don't have the money to continue replacing parts so this system will stay offline. That's ~1400 Ghz/days down. @Chris: Since I don't have access to the drive now, it will take a few days to know which assignments are stuck on the system. I'll move them to a working system when I can regenerate the work file.