![]() |
|
|
#222 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2·67·73 Posts |
Quote:
Just a quick note... Yes, it will offer those functions. But with meetings, family visiting, and a wedding tomorrow (not mine), I'm afraid I've not had as much time for development as I would have liked. I'll let you all know when these functions are actually enabled (and my apologies for the raw SQL statements some of you saw). And thanks to everyone for all the work!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#223 | |
|
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
1,123 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#224 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
22·691 Posts |
Thanks chalsall for the new assignment strategy.
@davieddy: cluth = clutch - {c} |
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#226 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
263616 Posts |
I can't remember who asked for this, but while I wait for my girlfriend to do her toenails for the wedding, I've made public the Released Trial Factoring Level Report.
Please note that the count is off by one for the LL range when compared to the Overall System Progress report. This is a known special case -- an assignment given to davieddy to test the anonymous transfer trick some time ago. (As a complete aside, I have to say how glad I am being a man. I can be ready for a formal occasion in five minutes.... )
Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2012-07-27 at 14:00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
3,389 Posts |
It appears "Spidy" might not be making his full rounds. Some of my completions submitted to PrimeNet are not showing up as completed in GPUto72 in the 41Mil range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#228 | |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
37516 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2012-07-27 at 14:00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
Apr 2011
in vivo
1138 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
1C3516 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#231 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
978210 Posts |
Quote:
Even now we release candidates above 55M at only 71 "bits" (but only after P-1) with the reasoning that until we handle everything below 55M to 72 we should not hold back the "wave front" (and there's something like a 50% chance we'll get another shot at them in the future). And, by then, we'll probably be taking everything above 55M to 73... ![]() Must sleep.... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Status | Primeinator | Operation Billion Digits | 5 | 2011-12-06 02:35 |
| 62 bit status | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 27 | 2008-09-29 13:52 |
| OBD Status | Uncwilly | Operation Billion Digits | 22 | 2005-10-25 14:05 |
| 1-2M LLR status | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 2 | 2005-03-13 17:03 |
| Status of 26.0M - 26.5M | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 25 | 2004-06-18 16:46 |