GPU to 72 status... - Page 181

RichD · 2013-02-19, 11:24

I've sent a report bug to the Contact Us on the home page several days ago. Is that address still monitored?

chalsall · 2013-02-19, 13:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichD

I've sent a report bug to the Contact Us on the home page several days ago. Is that address still monitored?

Yes. And thanks for the report. I just haven't had time to drill down on it yet.

bcp19 · 2013-02-20, 02:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

It is up to 2400 as of today. The TF assignments are only around 59, which is in the typical range. The number of 100M digit assignments that have yet to yield a result after a year or better seems quite high >97%

I don't see why this would be considered unusual, it took me right around a year to complete one and that was after moving it to a bit of a monster machine and devoting 2 cores (though it did have to have P-1 and a fair amount of TF done)

Uncwilly · 2013-02-20, 05:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcp19

I don't see why this would be considered unusual, it took me right around a year to complete one and that was after moving it to a bit of a monster machine and devoting 2 cores (though it did have to have P-1 and a fair amount of TF done)

Most of them have not done a single bit level of TF during that year. Even on a slow machine with a single core, one can take the expo from 74 to 75 in a reasonable time period. That is part of yielding a result. If the folks had taken the exponents that they got to 77, the current factoring report would be quite different.

KyleAskine · 2013-02-22, 13:34

Is the site currently down?

kracker · 2013-02-22, 15:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by KyleAskine

Is the site currently down?

It seems up right now.

(btw, long time no see!

)

kracker · 2013-02-22, 15:46

Been switching my minions to P-1.... currently about ¾ are running P-1 at around ~10-12 I believe a day. 'need to catch up to that "Chris Halsall" guy there

ckdo · 2013-02-23, 08:38

The ranking on the reports is rather broken, e.g. http://en.gpu72.com/reports/workers/:

Code:

87      ramgeis                         999
        Stocker33                       914

115     Anonymous                       46
        Anonymous                       31

128     mdettweiler                     4
        Jack Sandor                     3

Those shouldn't share a rank.

Also on http://en.gpu72.com/reports/workers/ll/

Code:

10      Chuck                           4,249
11      Sid & Andy                      3,303
15      Carsten Kossendey               3,158
12      Pete                            2,936
13      markr                           2,691
14      delta_t                         1,849

Where does the #15 part come from?

There's probably more, those just caught my eye.

LaurV · 2013-02-23, 08:57

Those ranks were always broken (i.e. they were never right, that is why people don't really pay attention to the numbers anymore). If you sort by, say, assigned ghzd, you see what I mean. Even in the main sorting (by "done") I was on position 20, but my number still was 18, and in front of me was 19 and 20 (to what I complained in the past, long ago).

ckdo · 2013-02-23, 09:18

Upon further inspection, that GHzd total is way off, and the #15 ranking would be correct based on the actual GHzd total. My bad.

Aramis Wyler · 2013-02-27, 01:49

Is the server down? I can't get the page to load more than partially.

2013-02-23, 08:38	#1988
ckdo Dec 2007 Cleves, Germany 2·5·53 Posts	The ranking on the reports is rather broken, e.g. http://en.gpu72.com/reports/workers/: Code: 87 ramgeis 999 Stocker33 914 115 Anonymous 46 Anonymous 31 128 mdettweiler 4 Jack Sandor 3 Those shouldn't share a rank. Also on http://en.gpu72.com/reports/workers/ll/ Code: 10 Chuck 4,249 11 Sid & Andy 3,303 15 Carsten Kossendey 3,158 12 Pete 2,936 13 markr 2,691 14 delta_t 1,849 Where does the #15 part come from? There's probably more, those just caught my eye.

2013-02-23, 08:57	#1989
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 10010110111111₂ Posts	Those ranks were always broken (i.e. they were never right, that is why people don't really pay attention to the numbers anymore). If you sort by, say, assigned ghzd, you see what I mean. Even in the main sorting (by "done") I was on position 20, but my number still was 18, and in front of me was 19 and 20 (to what I complained in the past, long ago). Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2013-02-23 at 08:58

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2013-02-19, 11:24	#1981
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 6475₈ Posts	I've sent a report bug to the Contact Us on the home page several days ago. Is that address still monitored?

2013-02-22, 13:34	#1985
KyleAskine Oct 2011 Maryland 2·5·29 Posts	Is the site currently down?

2013-02-22, 15:46	#1987
kracker "Mr. Meeseeks" Jan 2012 California, USA 2³×271 Posts	Been switching my minions to P-1.... currently about ¾ are running P-1 at around ~10-12 I believe a day. 'need to catch up to that "Chris Halsall" guy there

2013-02-23, 09:18	#1990
ckdo Dec 2007 Cleves, Germany 1000010010₂ Posts	Upon further inspection, that GHzd total is way off, and the #15 ranking would be correct based on the actual GHzd total. My bad.

2013-02-27, 01:49	#1991
Aramis Wyler "Bill Staffen" Jan 2013 Pittsburgh, PA, USA 2³·53 Posts	Is the server down? I can't get the page to load more than partially.