GPU to 72 status... - Page 180

ckdo · 2013-02-14, 10:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

I have added a new field to the LLTF and DCTF forms: GHz Days of work.

When I read that, I thought "Hey, just what I was about to suggest myself!". Turns out it is not, but the ideas fit together nicely.

What GPU72 is lacking is a way of telling how much work [in GHzd] of a certain work type you currently have assigned.

The Assignments page will give you the total GHzd you have assigned for (LLTF+DCTF) and (LL+DC) along with average performance since you joined the project and an ETA based thereupon. It does not have any information whatsoever on any of the four work types on its own.

The Overall Statistics page, as well as the individual work type reports will give you the assignment count, but not the GHzd assigned, for any of the four work types on its own.

So I would suggest that

(a) a "GHzd Assigned" column be added to the table on the Overall Statistics page,
(b) a "GHzd Out" column be added after the "Out" column in the work type reports (for all workers),
(c) per work type lines be added to the top table on the Assignments page, eventually, and
(d) the average rates and ETAs on the Assignments page be computed in a more meaningful way. I'd go with the greater of (all time average, 30 day running average), but there may well be better measures.

While we are at it, I'd like to have the overall data per 1M range added to the Factoring Cost/Percentage reports, i.e. simply not splitting the data by bit levels.

Also, on the Individual Factoring Cost report, an "Out" column (and potentially a "GHzd Out" column) may prove helpful in spotting results that have not been submitted or acknowledged yet.

chalsall · 2013-02-14, 18:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckdo

So I would suggest that...

Not asking for much, are you...

Everything you suggest are good ideas (if I understand them correctly).

The amalgamation of statistics at the top of the individual assignment report is a legacy thing which I can make smarter (read: break out for each individual work type). LaurV has asked for the same thing quite some time ago -- and more than once (

).

I have just finished implementing your suggestion of GHz Days (shortened to GHzD) assigned to the Workers' Report. As one would expect, it shows the GHz Days assigned -- overall and for each individual work type.

chalsall · 2013-02-14, 18:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by ixfd64

It might be a good idea to lower the default pledge level back to 72 bits right now.

I think we're going to be OK.

"Only" ~330 assignments were issued yesterday. And we have enough of a "pledge" volume to both 72 and 73 that even if we do need to release at 72 we'll have the numbers available.

So everyone knows, "What Makes Sense" is back to being Lowest Exponent.

kracker · 2013-02-14, 19:15

Just noticed the GhzD graph. Looks great!

chalsall · 2013-02-14, 21:23

I didn't think it was possible, but someone (Jerry) is about to pass Craig in overall GHzDays Done. Craig, we understand the reasons, but we miss your GPUs....

(This is an indirect way of also saying that I've changed the Workers' graphs to cover the last 16 months, rather than only one month.)

kladner · 2013-02-14, 23:02

That sure gives an interestingly different perspective.

EDIT: Congrats, Jerry! Enjoy it while the southern summer lasts!

flashjh · 2013-02-15, 00:47

It's an honor :surprised, but really only because the leader has all but flat-lined since late October. We will be moving sooner or later, so I'll have some flat-line time too

LaurV · 2013-02-15, 06:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

but someone (Jerry)

we think he bought the 4 gtx570 from xyzzy...

somehow we expected then didn't we?

Quote:

the last 16 months

long waited for! it was about the time... ~~god~~ science bless you!

bcp19 · 2013-02-15, 15:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

we think he bought the 4 gtx570 from xyzzy...

somehow we expected then didn't we?

long waited for! it was about the time... ~~god~~ science bless you!

I passed xyzzy but didn't cause nearly this much fuss lol

kladner · 2013-02-15, 15:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcp19

I passed xyzzy but didn't cause nearly this much fuss lol

I guess Place and Show aren't nearly as exciting unless you've got bets on them.

Uncwilly · 2013-02-18, 14:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Have seen a bump up of ~1/3 increase in the number of 332M LL assigned expos. We were running around 1500 for quite a while. Now it is 2200. I hope that they all do TF to at least 77 first.

It is up to 2400 as of today. The TF assignments are only around 59, which is in the typical range. The number of 100M digit assignments that have yet to yield a result after a year or better seems quite high >97%

2013-02-14, 23:02	#1975
kladner "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2·3·1,693 Posts	That sure gives an interestingly different perspective. EDIT: Congrats, Jerry! Enjoy it while the southern summer lasts! Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-02-14 at 23:04

2013-02-15, 00:47	#1976
flashjh "Jerry" Nov 2011 Vancouver, WA 463₁₆ Posts	It's an honor :surprised, but really only because the leader has all but flat-lined since late October. We will be moving sooner or later, so I'll have some flat-line time too Last fiddled with by flashjh on 2013-02-15 at 00:47

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2013-02-14, 19:15	#1973
kracker "Mr. Meeseeks" Jan 2012 California, USA 2³·271 Posts	Just noticed the GhzD graph. Looks great!

2013-02-14, 21:23	#1974
chalsall If I May "Chris Halsall" Sep 2002 Barbados 9,767 Posts	I didn't think it was possible, but someone (Jerry) is about to pass Craig in overall GHzDays Done. Craig, we understand the reasons, but we miss your GPUs.... (This is an indirect way of also saying that I've changed the Workers' graphs to cover the last 16 months, rather than only one month.)