mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet > GPU to 72

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2013-02-12, 13:46   #1948
Chuck
 
Chuck's Avatar
 
May 2011
Orange Park, FL

3·5·59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Also, the change to the system WRT MISFIT users has been made. Anyone who's "Option" setting is "What Makes Sense" will be assigned work to 73 regardless of what the pledge level is.

Again, anyone who instead wants to only go to 72 or 71, simply change the Option to anything else. Human interaction with the form remains the same, including the use of WMS. As in, if a human pledges to, for example, 72 that's what will be assigned for all Options including WMS.
This is excellent; I think of it as the "what Chris wants/best for GIMPS" option.
Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 14:30   #1949
Aramis Wyler
 
Aramis Wyler's Avatar
 
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA

23·53 Posts
Default

I still can't fathom why there's a difference between the automated WMS option and the manual one. I thik it will only breed confusion for people new to the project who start with manual sttings and move to auomated one. Are there any upsides at all to them being different?
Aramis Wyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 14:41   #1950
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

9,767 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler View Post
I still can't fathom why there's a difference between the automated WMS option and the manual one. I thik it will only breed confusion for people new to the project who start with manual sttings and move to auomated one. Are there any upsides at all to them being different?
They're not really different.

When a human looks at the assignment form, the default pledge is (now) 73. If they simply enter the number of assignments they want and click "Get Assignments" they will be given "What Makes Sense" (currently the same as "Lowest Exponent"). It is only if they change any of the parameters do things change.

The reason I've made the change to the behavior only for MISFIT is MISFIT simply does a POST to the form requesting assignments -- it doesn't first do a GET for the form to see what the Pledge level should be. Thus until this change I couldn't actually give assignments which "Made Sense".

At the end of the day the results work out to be the same for humans and MISFIT robots.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 16:55   #1951
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

100011000112 Posts
Default

An important thing to keep in mind is that WMS was built when there was no automation at all. Contrasted to a year ago, MISFIT has completely redefined mfaktX work. Because the one major intention of MISFIT is complete automation, the changes made G72 much more responsive to real-world demands. MISFIT users who use WMS can know that their automated system is doing what's best for GIMPS as a whole, while manual G72 users can still get exactly what they want.

Anyone wanting to move from manual to automated will understand the difference and reasons by just following the threads and development of G72/MISFIT.

Last fiddled with by flashjh on 2013-02-12 at 16:59
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 17:41   #1952
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

41708 Posts
Default

Just a thing on P-1....

(on another thought... I actually won't be able to do much P-1... the systems that have enough memory? They had memory for another reason I just 'membered. Meh. :\ )

Last fiddled with by kracker on 2013-02-12 at 17:44
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 17:49   #1953
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2·3·1,693 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kracker View Post
Just a thing on P-1....

(on another thought... I actually won't be able to do much P-1... the systems that have enough memory? They had memory for another reason I just 'membered. Meh. :\ )
Is it the sort of situation where 'LowMemWhileRunning' would be of any use?
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 18:04   #1954
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

23×271 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kladner View Post
Is it the sort of situation where 'LowMemWhileRunning' would be of any use?
Mike had mentioned it, and I had looked it up in undoc but couldn't really understand, But what does it actually do? Does it reduce memory when a specified program is run etc?
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 18:10   #1955
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

976710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kracker View Post
Mike had mentioned it, and I had looked it up in undoc but couldn't really understand, But what does it actually do? Does it reduce memory when a specified program is run etc?
Personally I find MaxHighMemWorkers=2 much more useful.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 18:26   #1956
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

100111101011102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kracker View Post
Mike had mentioned it, and I had looked it up in undoc but couldn't really understand, But what does it actually do? Does it reduce memory when a specified program is run etc?
When the specified program(s) run, it switches any Stage 2 P-1 workers to the next available Stage 1 assignment. In line with Chris's comment, I have found that for my Photoshop work I get the best results with PauseWhileRunning on 3 workers, and LowMemWhileRunning, and MaxHighMemWorkers=4. LowMem alone was still too sluggish. This means that while Photoshop and its cousins are running I switch from 6 P-1 workers with 4 High Mem workers, to 3 Stage 1 workers.

In prime.txt:
PauseWhileRunning=photoshop[3],bridge[3]
LowMemWhileRunning=photoshop,bridge
In local.txt:
MaxHighMemWorkers=4


Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-02-12 at 18:28
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 20:08   #1957
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

23·271 Posts
Default

MaxHighMemWorkers, 2, 3, or 4 what is the difference?
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-02-12, 20:23   #1958
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

100110001001112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kracker View Post
MaxHighMemWorkers, 2, 3, or 4 what is the difference?
The number of workers who can use the maximum allowed amount of RAM.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Status Primeinator Operation Billion Digits 5 2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 27 2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status Uncwilly Operation Billion Digits 22 2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status paulunderwood 3*2^n-1 Search 2 2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 25 2004-06-18 16:46

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:10.


Mon Aug 2 10:10:20 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 4:39, 0 users, load averages: 1.43, 1.35, 1.30

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.