GPU to 72 status... - Page 118

chalsall · 2012-06-12, 01:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

Assuming you are TFing "virgin" exponents, this is precisely what I have been advocating for a couple of years.

We really need a "Sigh...." emoticon....

Dubslow · 2012-06-12, 02:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

We really need a "Sigh...." emoticon....

Indeed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

When it was at 53M, we judged (accurately it is now clear)
that the GPU capacity could manage 72 bits for 200 NEW
LL assignments per day, hence the name "GPUto72".

I was thinking "that's what we were telling you...." ...

davieddy · 2012-06-12, 03:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

I was thinking "that's what we were telling you...." ...

You are telling me, but not DOING it.

chalsall · 2012-06-12, 04:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

You are telling me, but not DOING it.

Gee... To do what you want (only 200 a day to 72) we'd have to turn over 75% of our firepower away....

davieddy · 2012-06-12, 05:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Gee... To do what you want (only 200 a day to 72) we'd have to turn over 75% of our firepower away....

So why isn't every exponent >53M TFed to 72 at least?

Because you won't listen.

chalsall · 2012-06-12, 13:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

So why isn't every exponent >53M TFed to 72 at least?

"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." - Einstein

And, BTW, there are currently 52,977 candidates between 53M and 60M which we HAVE taken to 72 or above, and released back to PrimeNet. This is in addition to the 39,179 LL candidates below 53M which we've processed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

Because you won't listen.

Not to you. Nope.

c10ck3r · 2012-06-12, 16:15

C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!
Daveiddy, stick to being the community bard and give chalsall a break.

davieddy · 2012-06-13, 13:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Gee... To do what you want (only 200 a day to 72) we'd have to turn over 75% of our firepower away....

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

So why isn't every exponent >53M TFed to 72 at least?

Because you won't listen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

there are currently 52,977 candidates between 53M and 60M which we HAVE taken to 72 or above,

Not to you. Nope.

I rest my case.

petrw1 · 2012-06-13, 14:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

I rest my case.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjoH6TiW_eY

I think if you change the general topic from the opening of the tomb to the clearing exponents this could very well be a discussion between Chris and David.

davieddy · 2012-06-13, 15:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjoH6TiW_eY

I think if you change the general topic from the opening of the tomb to the clearing exponents this could very well be a discussion between Chris and David.

Uncwilly · 2012-06-13, 23:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

I think if you change the general topic from the opening of the tomb to ...

That discussion is about tombs, plural not singular.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2012-06-12, 16:15	#1294
c10ck3r Aug 2010 Kansas 547 Posts	C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER! Daveiddy, stick to being the community bard and give chalsall a break.