GPU to 72 status... - Page 106

flashjh · 2012-04-19, 02:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Thanks for the nudge, and the code...

I took a slightly different approach, with the intention of also being able to select by work types, expiring exponents, etc in the near future. But the code was a good inspiration, and what you've asked for is now implemented.

Awesome! Thanks ;)

chalsall · 2012-04-19, 03:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

Also, @chalsall: Xyzzy's graph appears to be broken?
http://gpu72.com/reports/worker/7e6a...4f765eb0f6ca8/
The "Worked Saved" reports a bunch of factors spread through April, but the "Work Done" graphs don't show anything since March.

Yeah... Xyzzy seems to enjoy messing with my head/code (don't know why; not a lot of sport in it)...

He's submitted nothing but factors (60 of them) since 2012.04.04....

Dubslow · 2012-04-19, 03:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Yeah... Xyzzy seems to enjoy messing with my head/code (don't know why; not a lot of sport in it)...

He's submitted nothing but factors (60 of them) since 2012.04.04....

...
...
...

...why? (42?)

My sympathies :P

Edit: Does that mean he unreserves assignments just before submitting them to PrimeNet? Or doesn't report them to PrimeNet? But then how do you know when to unreserve them? What about the throughput estimates? Wow, that's actually very problematic. My actual sympathies -- that's a lot of crap to handle.

flashjh · 2012-04-19, 03:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Yeah... Xyzzy seems to enjoy messing with my head/code (don't know why; not a lot of sport in it)...

He's submitted nothing but factors (60 of them) since 2012.04.04....

If he doesn't report everything, then if the exponents expire someone else will have to run them with a guarantee of finding no factors.

bcp19 · 2012-04-19, 03:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by kladner

That graph actually makes it look like Pete had a very long dry spell. Now, I know that statistics have no memory, but that long flat line makes it look like he deserved some good times.

EDIT: Or does this recent burst just put the past several months in deep shade? I see that that is approximately what he said in the first post. In any case, congrats bcp.

As Dubslow noted, most of my work has been in the DC range, which has very low 'saved' work for found factors. Most of these factors were from exponents that needed 69-72 work done, but it was a lucky streak.

Dubslow · 2012-04-19, 03:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcp19

As Dubslow noted, most of my work has been in the DC range, which has very low 'saved' work for found factors. Most of these factors were from exponents that needed 69-72 work done, but it was a lucky streak.

Actually, we've all forgotten about chalsall's new metric: you've found 38 factors to 34.6 expected, so not too lucky.

http://gpu72.com/reports/worker/b30b...40ebf12fbf217/

chalsall · 2012-04-19, 03:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashjh

If he doesn't report everything, then if the exponents expire someone else will have to run them with a guarantee of finding no factors.

I don't think he's being malicious; just playful...

But, yeah... It does mess with the WLRs, and thus the predicted factors found for everyone. Plus it means the predicted completion reports are under-estimating by a few days.

When you think about it, it's a little scary just how much influence Xyzzy has!!!

petrw1 · 2012-04-19, 04:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

...

Edit: Does that mean he unreserves assignments just before submitting them to PrimeNet? Or doesn't report them to PrimeNet?

He's always submitted everything before...eventually

KyleAskine · 2012-04-19, 11:13

He actually used to only submit NF results, and then would submit the F results in a huge wave. Who knows what he is up to now.

patrik · 2012-04-21, 21:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Yes, it was. 80 GD/D to be exact. It's now 20 GD/D.

Sorry about that.

Feel free to unreserve what you were assigned, and claim lower candidates.

There still seems to be some automated policies to be tweaked. I just got this. I hope it my card will stay occupied until tomorrow morning.

Quote:

Sorry Patrik Johansson, but you already have too many assignments.

Since you joined the project you have done on average 135.39 GHz Days of Trial Factoring work per day.

You currently have 12 assignments totalling 115.83 GHz Days of work assigned, or 0 days worth based on your history. The oldest is 28 days old.

In order to have access to additional assignments, please complete some more of the work already assigned (particularily the oldest), or Contact Us and explain why you should be exempted from this automated policy.

And the oldest should be only about 2 weeks (unless I lost one while copying and pasting). After counting, I have five assignments, about 2 weeks old, that has not been reported yet. Can I see somewhere what the other seven I am supposed to have are?

James Heinrich · 2012-04-21, 21:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrik

And the oldest should be only about 2 weeks (unless I lost one while copying and pasting).

If you look at http://www.gpu72.com/account/assignments/bydate/ you should see which one is 28 days old.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2012-04-19, 11:13	#1164
KyleAskine Oct 2011 Maryland 2×5×29 Posts	He actually used to only submit NF results, and then would submit the F results in a huge wave. Who knows what he is up to now.