GPU to 72 status... - Page 100

chalsall · 2012-04-10, 00:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batalov

...yet, the final result was "not needed", -- it was done by someone else (J.H.).

Sorry about that.

I made a mistake in an SQL update intended to release several thousand candidates back to PrimeNet to issue to those who refuse to use GPU72.

The good news is only three (inclusive of this) candidate assignments were effected.

Batalov · 2012-04-10, 00:07

That's all right, no big deal. I was worrying that there was a bigger leak, but three is negligible indeed.

petrw1 · 2012-04-10, 00:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

View added. Answer: less than 200 days to Trial Factor everything to the new GPU levels up to 60M for every candidate not already LLed.

Wow!!! GPUs are just amazing!!!

18 days later and we are down to 150 days.

science_man_88 · 2012-04-10, 00:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

18 days later and we are down to 150 days.

if the rate is linear it looks like 54 more days , if the rate is exponential it looks like maybe 41 more days possibly less. at least according to the math I did.

petrw1 · 2012-04-10, 01:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by science_man_88

if the rate is linear it looks like 54 more days , if the rate is exponential it looks like maybe 41 more days possibly less. at least according to the math I did.

It's odd; I would have thought there would be enough GPUto72 history to establish a closer estimation. Maybe there was a recent surge in activity.
And if that surge was a one-time then the average will move back to 200 days-ish and if it is a sign of more consistent activity then it will drop even faster.

rcv · 2012-04-10, 01:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

No; you are not interpreting the charts correctly. Please look, and come again.

I have already released 11,000 candidates back to PrimeNet to issue for Trial Factoring. Why don't you take some of them?

As an aside rcv, just how much TF work can you do compared to what we can do?

1. I had a feeling you would be playing games, so I captured a screen-shot immediately before my last post. See below. If I'm not interpreting it correctly, then please explain. The row marked 53M. The first green column headed "Reserved from PrimeNet / Total" contains the number 6588. The last green column headed "Assigned' contains the number 59.

2. I believe you deliberately released candidates that you *knew* PrimeNet would not hand out for Trial Factoring. [Yes, you gave back several thousand in the 59M range, which PrimeNet is now handing out for P-1 testing.] The Candidates George last stated were made available for Trial Factoring for GPUs (unless I missed an announcement) were under the lower 50M ranges. Exactly how many candidates did you return in the 53M, 54M, and 55M ranges?

3. You arrogant so-and-so. You have no business asking how much I can do or why I want the candidates. You have no business tracking me at all. (You also had no business giving me the complete login credentials, e-mail address, and password of another user, thanks to another of your many bugs.) The answer to your question is "It is none of *your* business".

[If George asks, I'll tell him my plans.]

Meanwhile, all you need to know is that I want candidates in *all* ranges. So, I am formally asking you to release excess candidates in *all* ranges, so that I may obtain some assignments directly from PrimeNet in any or all ranges I choose.

science_man_88 · 2012-04-10, 01:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

It's odd; I would have thought there would be enough GPUto72 history to establish a closer estimation. Maybe there was a recent surge in activity.
And if that surge was a one-time then the average will move back to 200 days-ish and if it is a sign of more consistent activity then it will drop even faster.

yeah I was just basing it on 50 days/18 days = 150 days/54 days and $\text {ceil}(150^{log_{18}(50)})= 41$

bcp19 · 2012-04-10, 02:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcv

1. I had a feeling you would be playing games, so I captured a screen-shot immediately before my last post. See below. If I'm not interpreting it correctly, then please explain. The row marked 53M. The first green column headed "Reserved from PrimeNet / Total" contains the number 6588. The last green column headed "Assigned' contains the number 59.

2. I believe you deliberately released candidates that you *knew* PrimeNet would not hand out for Trial Factoring. [Yes, you gave back several thousand in the 59M range, which PrimeNet is now handing out for P-1 testing.] The Candidates George last stated were made available for Trial Factoring for GPUs (unless I missed an announcement) were under the lower 50M ranges. Exactly how many candidates did you return in the 53M, 54M, and 55M ranges?

3. You arrogant so-and-so. You have no business asking how much I can do or why I want the candidates. You have no business tracking me at all. (You also had no business giving me the complete login credentials, e-mail address, and password of another user, thanks to another of your many bugs.) The answer to your question is "It is none of *your* business".

[If George asks, I'll tell him my plans.]

Meanwhile, all you need to know is that I want candidates in *all* ranges. So, I am formally asking you to release excess candidates in *all* ranges, so that I may obtain some assignments directly from PrimeNet in any or all ranges I choose.

Grow up already. If you look http://www.gpu72.com/reports/estimated_completion/ you will see a more accurate look at what primenet/GPU72 have.

Dubslow · 2012-04-10, 02:52

Is the P-1 pool limited to 200?

petrw1 · 2012-04-10, 03:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

Is the P-1 pool limited to 200?

It was supposed to be 1000; maybe that is simply all that is available?

Dubslow · 2012-04-10, 03:39

Somehow I don't think so. chalsall said that he threw back 600 or so earlier, in anticipation of a large batch of TF to 72 coming in, but it's never gone back up, in fact it's gone down, and it's been stable at exactly 200 for most of the day. OTOH, 200 is only two days' worth, that's why we went with 1000 originally...

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2012-04-10, 00:07	#1091
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 9497₁₀ Posts	That's all right, no big deal. I was worrying that there was a bigger leak, but three is negligible indeed.

2012-04-10, 02:52	#1098
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 1C35₁₆ Posts	Is the P-1 pool limited to 200?

2012-04-10, 03:39	#1100
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 7221₁₀ Posts	Somehow I don't think so. chalsall said that he threw back 600 or so earlier, in anticipation of a large batch of TF to 72 coming in, but it's never gone back up, in fact it's gone down, and it's been stable at exactly 200 for most of the day. OTOH, 200 is only two days' worth, that's why we went with 1000 originally...