mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-09-08, 00:02   #12
TheMawn
 
TheMawn's Avatar
 
May 2013
East. Always East.

11·157 Posts
Default

How important is memory bandwidth for P-1, particularly for very large exponents?

I don't suppose someone could try P-1 using four or more SSD's in Raid 0?
TheMawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 00:29   #13
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

2×53×71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lbh134679 View Post
A factor of MM61 and MM127 can be found, I guess, above 10^100 or even 10^1000. Well, probably.
And on what basis do you make such a claim?
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 01:51   #14
blahpy
 
blahpy's Avatar
 
Jun 2013

107 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMawn View Post
How important is memory bandwidth for P-1, particularly for very large exponents?

I don't suppose someone could try P-1 using four or more SSD's in Raid 0?
Lol, wouldn't that completely kill your SSDs?
blahpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 03:15   #15
lbh134679
 
Sep 2013
China

22 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
And on what basis do you make such a claim?
For P>127 and 2^P-1 is prime (like 521,607,1279……57885161), none of the Ps can be expressed as 2^N-1, 2^N+1, 4^N-3, or 4^N+3. But it is not a theory, so I put "I guess", MM61 and MM127 are both composite, perhaps their smallest factors are extremely big.

Last fiddled with by lbh134679 on 2013-09-08 at 03:21
lbh134679 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 03:41   #16
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

36×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lbh134679 View Post
...But it is not a theory...
Correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbh134679 View Post
... perhaps their smallest factors are extremely big.
Define "extremely big".

The first rule of math club is -- you forget all the colloquial meanings of words.
The second rule of math club is -- you forget all the colloquial meanings of words.
The third rule of math club is -- you define the meaning of all new words that you create, unless they are in the established vocabulary (which is a learnable skill).
The forth and last rule of math club is -- if this is you first night at the club, you have to fight. (or else - you can lurk and listen... or you add a question mark to anything you utter.)

...take it easy!
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 04:04   #17
TheMawn
 
TheMawn's Avatar
 
May 2013
East. Always East.

11·157 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
The forth and last rule of math club is -- if this is you first night at the club, you have to fight. (or else - you can lurk and listen... or you add a question mark to anything you utter.)
LMFAO!!!!!

Last fiddled with by TheMawn on 2013-09-08 at 04:04
TheMawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 04:43   #18
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

36·13 Posts
Default

There's a very likable Coursera class on right now, so I guess some of the terminology simply rubs in. You see, the professor makes a clear distinction there - between utterances, linguistic acts, speech acts, and finally arguments. (and that's is even before the discussion of strength and validity an arguments. That is some utterances are not linguistic acts, not all linguistic acts are speech acts, and not all of those are even entering arguments. It's loads of fun! I recommend joining if it is still open.)
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 05:22   #19
lbh134679
 
Sep 2013
China

22 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
Correct.

Define "extremely big".

The first rule of math club is -- you forget all the colloquial meanings of words.
The second rule of math club is -- you forget all the colloquial meanings of words.
The third rule of math club is -- you define the meaning of all new words that you create, unless they are in the established vocabulary (which is a learnable skill).
The forth and last rule of math club is -- if this is you first night at the club, you have to fight. (or else - you can lurk and listen... or you add a question mark to anything you utter.)

...take it easy!
Maybe I should use "very high". Catalan's Mersenne Conjecture is likely to be an example of the Strong Law of Small Numbers. However, once MM127 is proved to be prime, the Conjecture may remain unsolved forever, for MMM127 is much too high to test. Unless the Conjecture is proved.
lbh134679 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 06:52   #20
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

4,861 Posts
Default

In post 15, you labelled MM127 composite. In Post 19, you say "once MM127 is proved prime". Which side of this is your non-theory utterance positing is true, and why?

How does using "very high" help you to communicate how high you mean, or how much a GPU will help you get there?
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 07:37   #21
lbh134679
 
Sep 2013
China

22 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
In post 15, you labelled MM127 composite. In Post 19, you say "once MM127 is proved prime". Which side of this is your non-theory utterance positing is true, and why?

How does using "very high" help you to communicate how high you mean, or how much a GPU will help you get there?
No one knows whether MM127 is prime right now, but I hope it is composite, because it is helpful for us to solve the problem of "Catalan Mersenne Conjecture".
The best way to prove MM127 is composite is to find a factor. What we could do is to search for it, no matter how high it is.

Last fiddled with by lbh134679 on 2013-09-08 at 07:38
lbh134679 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-08, 10:30   #22
blahpy
 
blahpy's Avatar
 
Jun 2013

107 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lbh134679 View Post
The best way to prove MM127 is composite is to find a factor. What we could do is to search for it, no matter how high it is.
So far, MM127 has had trial division done from k=1 to k=72,500,000,000,000,000 with no factor found, except for the range from k=33,500,000,000,000,000 to k=35,000,000,000,000,000. k=72,500,000,000,000,000 is about 184 bits. People are already trying to factor it at very high bounds, and it only gets more and more time-consuming to continue each higher bit level.
blahpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nuke attack - run or hide? MooMoo2 Soap Box 40 2018-01-19 23:48
Let's attack the Bayesian-ECM-bounds again fivemack Math 33 2017-02-10 00:10
Attack of the Cosmic Rays S485122 Hardware 3 2010-08-24 01:19
Attack of the Killer Zombies ewmayer Lounge 12 2007-01-30 05:56
Factoring Double mersennes Citrix Miscellaneous Math 2 2005-10-04 08:08

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:12.


Sat Jul 17 04:12:59 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 2 hrs, 1 user, load averages: 3.47, 2.68, 2.25

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.