![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
May 2013
East. Always East.
11·157 Posts |
How important is memory bandwidth for P-1, particularly for very large exponents?
I don't suppose someone could try P-1 using four or more SSD's in Raid 0? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×53×71 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Jun 2013
107 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Sep 2013
China
22 Posts |
For P>127 and 2^P-1 is prime (like 521,607,1279……57885161), none of the Ps can be expressed as 2^N-1, 2^N+1, 4^N-3, or 4^N+3. But it is not a theory, so I put "I guess", MM61 and MM127 are both composite, perhaps their smallest factors are extremely big.
Last fiddled with by lbh134679 on 2013-09-08 at 03:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36×13 Posts |
Correct.
Define "extremely big". The first rule of math club is -- you forget all the colloquial meanings of words. The second rule of math club is -- you forget all the colloquial meanings of words. The third rule of math club is -- you define the meaning of all new words that you create, unless they are in the established vocabulary (which is a learnable skill). The forth and last rule of math club is -- if this is you first night at the club, you have to fight. (or else - you can lurk and listen... or you add a question mark to anything you utter.) ...take it easy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
May 2013
East. Always East.
11·157 Posts |
LMFAO!!!!!
Last fiddled with by TheMawn on 2013-09-08 at 04:04 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36·13 Posts |
There's a very likable Coursera class on right now, so I guess some of the terminology simply rubs in. You see, the professor makes a clear distinction there - between utterances, linguistic acts, speech acts, and finally arguments. (and that's is even before the discussion of strength and validity an arguments. That is some utterances are not linguistic acts, not all linguistic acts are speech acts, and not all of those are even entering arguments. It's loads of fun! I recommend joining if it is still open.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Sep 2013
China
22 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4,861 Posts |
In post 15, you labelled MM127 composite. In Post 19, you say "once MM127 is proved prime". Which side of this is your non-theory utterance positing is true, and why?
How does using "very high" help you to communicate how high you mean, or how much a GPU will help you get there? |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Sep 2013
China
22 Posts |
Quote:
The best way to prove MM127 is composite is to find a factor. What we could do is to search for it, no matter how high it is.
Last fiddled with by lbh134679 on 2013-09-08 at 07:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Jun 2013
107 Posts |
So far, MM127 has had trial division done from k=1 to k=72,500,000,000,000,000 with no factor found, except for the range from k=33,500,000,000,000,000 to k=35,000,000,000,000,000. k=72,500,000,000,000,000 is about 184 bits. People are already trying to factor it at very high bounds, and it only gets more and more time-consuming to continue each higher bit level.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nuke attack - run or hide? | MooMoo2 | Soap Box | 40 | 2018-01-19 23:48 |
| Let's attack the Bayesian-ECM-bounds again | fivemack | Math | 33 | 2017-02-10 00:10 |
| Attack of the Cosmic Rays | S485122 | Hardware | 3 | 2010-08-24 01:19 |
| Attack of the Killer Zombies | ewmayer | Lounge | 12 | 2007-01-30 05:56 |
| Factoring Double mersennes | Citrix | Miscellaneous Math | 2 | 2005-10-04 08:08 |