Unable to submit / retrieve new work - Page 2

Hop · 2011-11-12, 10:25

Thanks for the info. When I said "factoring", I'm not actually sure what process I'm going through at the moment. I'm just doing whatever work gets sent in my direction. "Primality Testing" apparently.
If there's a way to get the GPU involved, I'm all ears.

Regarding HT, so basically I'm better off running 4 workers each running 1 thread than 2 workers with 2 threads?

Dubslow · 2011-11-12, 20:07

I was actually more replying to petrw1 than to you, it seems like we've got you fixed up. 2/2 is best, like we said before; what I just said was about when somebody has two workers using one thread apiece, without using the other logical core. As in, running workers on 1&3 only, instead of running one worker on 1&2 and the other on 3&4, as you're doing currently.

As for GPUs, there's a couple of FAQ threads in the GPU forum. As for your worktype, it probably is primality testing. If you see "Seconds per iteration" or something similar than that's what it is.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How do we prevent miraculously true DC results from manual submit?	leonardyan96	PrimeNet	77	2017-06-01 16:18
MLucas, submit results?	Sleeping_menace	Mlucas	17	2015-06-13 03:12
how to submit manually a job with exponent 100M which is done by mfaktc?	fairsky	Information & Answers	17	2013-09-16 19:49
Only submit part of ECM results?	dabaichi	PrimeNet	5	2011-12-07 19:27
Retrieve work that makes most sense	db597	Software	11	2005-05-27 06:49

2011-11-12, 10:25	#12
Hop Nov 2011 3 Posts	Thanks for the info. When I said "factoring", I'm not actually sure what process I'm going through at the moment. I'm just doing whatever work gets sent in my direction. "Primality Testing" apparently. If there's a way to get the GPU involved, I'm all ears. Regarding HT, so basically I'm better off running 4 workers each running 1 thread than 2 workers with 2 threads?

2011-11-12, 20:07	#13
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3·29·83 Posts	I was actually more replying to petrw1 than to you, it seems like we've got you fixed up. 2/2 is best, like we said before; what I just said was about when somebody has two workers using one thread apiece, without using the other logical core. As in, running workers on 1&3 only, instead of running one worker on 1&2 and the other on 3&4, as you're doing currently. As for GPUs, there's a couple of FAQ threads in the GPU forum. As for your worktype, it probably is primality testing. If you see "Seconds per iteration" or something similar than that's what it is.