![]() |
|
|
#23 |
|
Mar 2007
179 Posts |
I found a factor the first night...
M44322479 has a factor: 4191953478431140516439 ... still working on the rest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
17×487 Posts |
Wonderful! Thanks, that saves me (and the GIMPS project) 2-3 weeks of LL testing. Perhaps that will encourage others to take advantage of this great service GPUers can provide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Just note that I have only a GTX 275, not a 4xx or 5xx monster... If you have some spare exponents, please count me in. Luigi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
Quote:
ahead of the wavefront. We have two years worth of 71 bits. Plenty time for one more. BTW 72 bits being the feasible goal came from Jacob rather than me. I'd cite the post, but this game changes by the day. Hence the stupidity of looking further than two years ahead. David |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
92810 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Jun 2003
7×167 Posts |
Quote:
Or for the same resources, we could take maybe 700 exponents* or thereabouts between 45M and 53M from 69 to 70, finding about 7 factors per day. I've already asked you why your proposal is better than what we're doing. I'm still waiting for your explanation. *It wouldn't be four times as many, because it takes longer to factor smaller exponents to the same bit level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2×3×1,693 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Jun 2003
7·167 Posts |
The ones to 69 bits will all be less than 50M.
My thinking here is that among those exponents needing 69-70, I am prioritising the higher exponents, on the grounds that they take less time to complete, and that any factors found are more valuable. Factorisation 68-69 has priority, but once this has been done, these small exponents fall to the end of the priority queue. But I can't always be bothered with this, so sometimes I just tell people to take them straight from 68-70. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
11100001101012 Posts |
Mr. P-1, I can take around 50-100 more assignments at the moment. I have ~25 in queue right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
24·173 Posts |
Too much micromanaging involved. Just take them to 70 already!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Jun 2003
49116 Posts |
Agreed, given that there are so few of them. I'll do that in future.
Could everyone who has accepted assignments from me please send me your results files after you have submitted them to the server. It doesn't matter if they have other assignments mixed in with mine. Thanks everyone for your help. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Exponents which don't need any more ECM | MatWur-S530113 | PrimeNet | 8 | 2016-10-12 08:00 |
| 77.9M exponents | GP2 | Data | 9 | 2016-08-21 14:10 |
| ECM for exponents above 20,000,000 | TObject | Data | 25 | 2014-05-24 15:45 |
| Unreserving exponents(these exponents haven't been done) | jasong | Marin's Mersenne-aries | 7 | 2006-12-22 21:59 |
| >10,000,000 exponents | ninjabill | PrimeNet | 5 | 2006-02-07 17:28 |