![]() |
|
|
#56 |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
34038 Posts |
WAG??? My foot!!!! that's at least a SWAG! (Sophisticated WAG). ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | ||
|
Jun 2003
7×167 Posts |
Quote:
I intend to grab every exponent to 50M within minutes of expiry, i.e., at about quarter to midnight UTC, then unreserve every one TFed to 70 bits or more, and every one TFed to 69 and P-1ed. I don't know if I'll manage to sift them and do this by midnight UTC, but I'll try to make sure there are a few small ones available to your script by then. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Jun 2003
7×167 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Jun 2003
100100100012 Posts |
Today, there were 248 expiries under 50M. Of these:
120 were 68-bit 39 69-bit (no p-1) 61 69-bit (with p-1) 20 70-bit 4 71-bit 4 72 bit In accordance with previous discussion, I will hold onto the 68s and the no-p-1 69s for the time being and have unreserved the rest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
5×359 Posts |
Benchmark from the GTX440 tonight.
no factor for M44918161 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32] tf(): total time spent: 4h 53m 4.319s 16 more like those remain from your first batch. I'm planning on turning them in to the "manual assignments page". Do you want me to PM you with the results as well? And what fate the batch of 150? I've passed the part you wanted to P-1 and the part in the continuation to a high-end GT480, but it is significantly less reliable than the GT440 because of the arrangements surrounding the machine, which is shared, and because it runs Windows, which shuts down on its own in the middle of the night despite my best efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
For 45M from 68-70, takes 46-47 minutes for me. So that's 29-30 assignments of that sort per day. (Though a pretty decent chunk of TF2 is played per day, so budget 26-27, and I'm also helping ckdo with DC's, so not every day will go to this. Time will be served on a first come first serve basis.)
Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2011-10-21 at 03:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Jun 2003
32·5·113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
3×5×59 Posts |
Quote:
Chuck |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
22×691 Posts |
Quote:
You don't need to bother sifting. Think of my script as a low priority backup for the days you are not able to reserve exponents. And I run it at 5 past the hour. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Jun 2003
7×167 Posts |
I think the most useful unit of work here is a TF68-69. Everything else will be in multiples of that.
Based upon what people have said in this thread so far: Dubslow ??? 15-16 minutes (about 90 per day) Christenson GTX440 36-37 minutes (about 40 per day) Christenson GT480 ??? garo ??? 13-14 minutes (est.) (about 100 per day) Chuck GTX580 ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Jun 2003
7×167 Posts |
Quote:
In other words, for DCs in the range 22.5M to 25M, a TF to 66 bits is as valuable to the project as our TFs to 70. TFs higher than that are less valuable. As I've said on many occasions, the ethos of the project is not "do what makes most sense", but "do whatever floats your own boat". I'm just giving you information here, not telling you what to do. It's all good. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A quick question | Pegos | Information & Answers | 6 | 2016-08-11 14:39 |
| Quick TF Question | Dubslow | GPU Computing | 2 | 2011-10-27 04:49 |
| Quick msieve question | alkirah | Msieve | 2 | 2009-12-30 14:00 |
| Quick question about P90 CPU metric | stars10250 | PrimeNet | 9 | 2008-08-31 23:58 |
| Quick p-1 question | Unregistered | Software | 8 | 2006-10-13 23:35 |