![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Aug 2006
3×1,993 Posts |
I was wondering if anyone knew of a comparison of implementations of SQFOF vs. McKee's 1999 method. Both seem to be useful in the 10 to 20 digit range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
352210 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Aug 2006
3×1,993 Posts |
Thanks, that was very helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
2×3×587 Posts |
Thanks, I thought so too. It saved me from writing the fast return variant of SQUFOF, since in the size range I was interested in, it appeared to have a negligible speedup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
7·292 Posts |
That paper compares the varying speeds of the different methods very well but it would be nice if it took a look at combining the methods for an optimal result. For example at what number of bits would we start doing a tiny bit of ecm or p-1 before siqs.
I am guessing the recent improvements in the smallqs code in YAFU are due to this paper. |
|
|
|