![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jun 2009
22·52·7 Posts |
Hi!
I am fooling around with PFGW and the documentation says that it will "automatically find multi-prime sets from NewPGen files, such as twins or sophies etc." But I end up with a list of PRPs from the +1 side when I feed a NewPGen twin sieve file into PFGW. Of course I can prove these, then test their -1 partners. But that means I might test much more than necessary. Is there any way to make PFGW test the -1 side as soon as the +1 side is found PRP? Thanks, Peter EDIT: Sorry for the confusion, using -l I found in the logfile that it does indeed test the -1 candidates when +1 is PRP, I just did not see it without the -l switch. Feel free to delete this thread if you like. Last fiddled with by Puzzle-Peter on 2011-06-25 at 07:47 Reason: found it |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Manual Results Question ... an easy one. | petrw1 | PrimeNet | 7 | 2013-08-14 13:54 |
| PFGW 3.3.6 or PFGW 3.4.2 Please update now! | Joe O | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 5 | 2010-09-30 14:07 |
| Easy Question | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 14 | 2009-10-03 17:52 |
| The Twins | GP2 | Lounge | 1 | 2003-11-18 04:50 |
| NOT twins | graeme | Puzzles | 11 | 2003-09-04 00:41 |