mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-12-13, 23:20   #254
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3×29×83 Posts
Default

It's all about the GPU and a CPU that can provide it. Either or many core Phenom or Sandy Bridge. Sandy Bridge is better in general, but there's nothing specific to mfakt* that any of the old processors has either as an advantage over the others. I'd recommend Sandy Bridge just because for everything it's shown remarkable computing ability. For reference one core of my 2600k is almost capable of keeping pace with a GTX 460 on its own. Not sure how nVidia cards compare though.

Edit: I was in the middle of typing this when my roommates told me I'd been trolled continuously for the past month. Sorry about the cross post.

Edit2: P-1 and LL are always appreciated.

Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2011-12-13 at 23:22
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-14, 01:39   #255
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

46316 Posts
Default Info and 11.12 drivers

Thanks for the inputs, so far. I know I don't have to spend a fortune, and my current system was doing very well. But, since I was thinking of upgrading anyway I figured I would go for a really good one (or so I thought). I had read a lot about the 8 Core AMDs, but I didn't see too much on the new Opterons, so I thought I would give it a shot -- whoops.

For the folks in the top 10, I would be curious to know what hardware you're using for my future upgrade considertions -- thanks.

BDOT - So, I upgraded to the 11.12 drivers a minute ago when I was reinstalling everything. I ran self test for vector sizes 1|2|4|8 and they all passed with the pre-release 2 v.10.
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-14, 03:09   #256
bcp19
 
bcp19's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

12478 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flashjh View Post
Thanks for the inputs, so far. I know I don't have to spend a fortune, and my current system was doing very well. But, since I was thinking of upgrading anyway I figured I would go for a really good one (or so I thought). I had read a lot about the 8 Core AMDs, but I didn't see too much on the new Opterons, so I thought I would give it a shot -- whoops.

For the folks in the top 10, I would be curious to know what hardware you're using for my future upgrade considertions -- thanks.

BDOT - So, I upgraded to the 11.12 drivers a minute ago when I was reinstalling everything. I ran self test for vector sizes 1|2|4|8 and they all passed with the pre-release 2 v.10.
If you goto http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=16284 you can see the CPUs/GPUs I am running (they keep me in the top 5). The 560 is slightly OC (EVGA runs at 1701 MHz vs 1645 for nVidia. Still tinkering with the 2500, so not OC yet.
bcp19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-14, 17:49   #257
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·29·83 Posts
Default

Nucleon and xyzzy both have 3-4 GPU powerhouses, mostly consisting of GTX 580s. I'm not sure if anybody either in PN top 10 or GPU272 top ten use AMD cards/mfakto... That's a worthwhile question.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-14, 18:50   #258
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·29·83 Posts
Default

Edit: Here's a link to their hardware lists. xyzzy is two posts after nucleon.
http://mersenneforum.org/showthread....050#post275729


Wow. I hit the edit button, and while I was editing the 1 hr limit expired. New post now. Check out the post times.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-14, 19:29   #259
KyleAskine
 
KyleAskine's Avatar
 
Oct 2011
Maryland

29010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
Nucleon and xyzzy both have 3-4 GPU powerhouses, mostly consisting of GTX 580s. I'm not sure if anybody either in PN top 10 or GPU272 top ten use AMD cards/mfakto... That's a worthwhile question.
I suspect I am the largerst AMD only person on the network (though I would absolutely love to be proved wrong).

I have 2x6970 and 1x5870. I finally got everything running at what I suspect is maximum efficiency (for me) a couple days ago.
KyleAskine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-14, 19:37   #260
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

1C3516 Posts
Default

btw, props to you on the breadth first thing. You have by far the most factors with much less work.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-14, 20:19   #261
Bdot
 
Bdot's Avatar
 
Nov 2010
Germany

3×199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flashjh View Post
I had read a lot about the 8 Core AMDs, but I didn't see too much on the new Opterons, so I thought I would give it a shot -- whoops.
Did you try adding more instances? The "8 times slower" is certainly disturbing. I read that the first boards (among them the review ones!) really sucked with bulldozer. In the meantime some do a better job. However, RedHat 6.2 is the only OS so far to really make use of bulldozer. Windows 8 may add that, but it's not sure yet.

Also, I need to get a newer gcc that can issue the right instruction scheduling for bulldozer (would be a special mfakto edition ).

In other words, the software side may improve the picture quite a bit within the next couple of weeks. But I sincerely doubt it will improve 8 times.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flashjh View Post
BDOT - So, I upgraded to the 11.12 drivers a minute ago when I was reinstalling everything. I ran self test for vector sizes 1|2|4|8 and they all passed with the pre-release 2 v.10.
Thanks for this test! If you still have mfakto 0.09 around (with the later kernel to fix the mul24/mad24 issues in 11.10), could you give that a try on 11.12 and run a selftest?
Bdot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-15, 00:20   #262
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

1,123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdot View Post
Did you try adding more instances? The "8 times slower" is certainly disturbing. I read that the first boards (among them the review ones!) really sucked with bulldozer. In the meantime some do a better job. However, RedHat 6.2 is the only OS so far to really make use of bulldozer. Windows 8 may add that, but it's not sure yet.
I did try more instances - up to 8 (four per GPU). I also tried 6 on one GPU. I may not be the expert at maximum throughput, but all combinations were not good. Maybe I'll try a Redhad once I get my new power supply. I don't know much about Linux though... haven't used it in a while.

Quote:
Also, I need to get a newer gcc that can issue the right instruction scheduling for bulldozer (would be a special mfakto edition ).

In other words, the software side may improve the picture quite a bit within the next couple of weeks. But I sincerely doubt it will improve 8 times.
Do they have a newer compiler for bulldozer?

Quote:
Thanks for this test! If you still have mfakto 0.09 around (with the later kernel to fix the mul24/mad24 issues in 11.10), could you give that a try on 11.12 and run a selftest?
I wasn't able to get the selt tests to work. I used the .09 mfakto with the kernal from your post to fix the 11.10 problems. Vector size 1 failed immediately. 2|4|8 finished, but they all failed. I emailed you a zip file with the outputs from all four runs so you can see them.


Also, do you have a 32 bit version that works with 11.12? I would like to test by 32 bit machine with 11.12 for throughput.
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-15, 00:23   #263
aaronhaviland
 
Jan 2011
Dudley, MA, USA

73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleAskine View Post
I suspect I am the largerst AMD only person on the network (though I would absolutely love to be proved wrong).

I have 2x6970 and 1x5870. I finally got everything running at what I suspect is maximum efficiency (for me) a couple days ago.
I suspect I'm not far behind: 2x6870 and 1x6950 supported by a Phenom II X6 1075T... haven't been running it 24/7 but with winter here, I will likely do so. (I've also got a GTX460/Core i5... but I'm currently doing something else with that)

I've actually found that running 2 clients per card (my most efficient - maximises the 6 CPU cores as well as the GPUs) I appear to be hitting some bandwidth restriction, as feeding all three at the same time is causing a bottleneck somewhere (determined by experimentation of different configurations). I know my PCI slots are all running at x8 speed, but this should still be fast enough.
aaronhaviland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-12-16, 22:07   #264
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

21438 Posts
Default AMD Bulldozer Update

Good reading and hopefully good news for Bulldozer CPUs... now I just need to get my power supply in so I can test everything!

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2592546
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
gpuOwL: an OpenCL program for Mersenne primality testing preda GpuOwl 2719 2021-08-05 22:43
mfaktc: a CUDA program for Mersenne prefactoring TheJudger GPU Computing 3497 2021-06-05 12:27
LL with OpenCL msft GPU Computing 433 2019-06-23 21:11
OpenCL for FPGAs TObject GPU Computing 2 2013-10-12 21:09
Program to TF Mersenne numbers with more than 1 sextillion digits? Stargate38 Factoring 24 2011-11-03 00:34

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:02.


Fri Aug 6 13:02:30 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 7:31, 1 user, load averages: 3.01, 2.93, 2.74

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.