mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-11-02, 10:38   #1244
AK76
 
Sep 2014

238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kracker View Post
Hmm... how are your thermals?

On another note, I've ordered a R9 285... Will have results by Tuesday/Wednesday.
GPU-Z show 77-80 Celsius and 100% load.
AK76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-02, 15:46   #1245
Cruelty
 
Cruelty's Avatar
 
May 2005

23·7·29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AK76 View Post
GPU-Z show 77-80 Celsius and 100% load.
It would be interesting to see full GPU-Z readings - your GPU may throttle not because of high GPU temperature but high VRM temperature. I've had such a problem with HD7870XT while ago...
Cruelty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-02, 17:14   #1246
AK76
 
Sep 2014

19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruelty View Post
It would be interesting to see full GPU-Z readings - your GPU may throttle not because of high GPU temperature but high VRM temperature. I've had such a problem with HD7870XT while ago...
GPU log
Attached Files
File Type: txt GPU-Z Sensor Log.txt (49.3 KB, 177 views)
AK76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-03, 09:29   #1247
Cruelty
 
Cruelty's Avatar
 
May 2005

110010110002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AK76 View Post
GPU log
I don't see throttling or thermal issues in this log The only issue I see there is the +12V voltage, which according to ATX specs should not fall below 11.4V. Of course you would have to confirm it with some digital multimeter before RMA, nevertheless it shouldn't impact GPU performance since it is running at stock specs.

The other things that come to my mind:
  • PCI-E link speed - but I don't think it would cause you trouble even at v1.0 x1
  • something else consuming your system resources (Prime95, LLR, PFGW, other?)
  • software issues - e.g. messy driver installation (installing new version without prior uninstalation of an old one)
  • overclocking issues - try to go back to FSB @ 333MHz and check if it solves your problem. BTW: what is your PCI-E frequency @ FSB=443MHz? Using default multipliers it may be running way out of specs and thus causing troubles.
Cruelty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-03, 23:58   #1248
Bdot
 
Bdot's Avatar
 
Nov 2010
Germany

3·199 Posts
Default mfakto-0.15pre5 available

I've uploaded another test version to the ftp with improvements for GCN 1.2 devices and for the perftest.

  • I now added a GPU type "GCN3" for Hawaii, Bonaire, Tonga and Vesuvius, which should improve "normal" TF speed by ~20%
    Please confirm if you have one of these (Bonaire = HD7790 is just a guess of mine).
  • you have sent so many test results to me that I noticed I should have sorted the --perftest output ...
  • --perftest now displays mfakto version and GPU info
  • --perftest now also shows a nice performance summary for each exponent
  • using "OCLCompileOptions=+ -USE_DP" mfakto can now be switched to double precision without changing the GPU type
  • there was indeed an overflow bug in the CPU-sieved perftest (only on cards faster than mine )
For cards not in the GCN3 category there should not be a lot of changes - no need to rerun any test. But if anyone wants to run another perftest, then please use this version for the nicer output.


Thank you all for your help.
Bdot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-04, 20:00   #1249
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

23×271 Posts
Default

HD4600 results... Tonga and APU coming later
Attached Files
File Type: zip HD4600.zip (39.9 KB, 86 views)

Last fiddled with by kracker on 2014-11-04 at 20:00
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-04, 21:40   #1250
NickOfTime
 
Apr 2014

528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdot View Post
I've uploaded another test version to the ftp with improvements for GCN 1.2 devices and for the perftest.

  • I now added a GPU type "GCN3" for Hawaii, Bonaire, Tonga and Vesuvius, which should improve "normal" TF speed by ~20%
    Please confirm if you have one of these (Bonaire = HD7790 is just a guess of mine).
  • you have sent so many test results to me that I noticed I should have sorted the --perftest output ...
  • --perftest now displays mfakto version and GPU info
  • --perftest now also shows a nice performance summary for each exponent
  • using "OCLCompileOptions=+ -USE_DP" mfakto can now be switched to double precision without changing the GPU type
  • there was indeed an overflow bug in the CPU-sieved perftest (only on cards faster than mine )
For cards not in the GCN3 category there should not be a lot of changes - no need to rerun any test. But if anyone wants to run another perftest, then please use this version for the nicer output.


Thank you all for your help.
Hmm, I believe my Radeon 260X is bonaire, I test that as well as my 290x again...
NickOfTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-05, 02:28   #1251
NickOfTime
 
Apr 2014

2·3·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickOfTime View Post
Hmm, I believe my Radeon 260X is bonaire, I test that as well as my 290x again...
testresults15pre5_260x_bonaire.7z
NickOfTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-05, 02:35   #1252
NickOfTime
 
Apr 2014

2A16 Posts
Default

And the 290x. Since I am reconfiguring one machine one card is running at 8x @74C and the other at 16x @64C for pcie...
testresults_290x_pciex8.7z
testresults_290xpciex16.7z

Last fiddled with by NickOfTime on 2014-11-05 at 02:36
NickOfTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-05, 15:32   #1253
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

23×271 Posts
Default

Well... this is depressing. I reinstalled the driver about three times now for my new 285, the driver crashes while running mfakto's test...

EDIT: Running the "regular" 0.14 mfakto on regular work doesn't crash... Weird.

Last fiddled with by kracker on 2014-11-05 at 15:49
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-11-05, 16:05   #1254
NickOfTime
 
Apr 2014

2×3×7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickOfTime View Post
And the 290x. Since I am reconfiguring one machine one card is running at 8x @74C and the other at 16x @64C for pcie...
Attachment 11932
Attachment 11933
Hmm, I tried running it concurrently on my 290x's in the 70M 74bit range and I start seeing fluxations in Ghz/d , GPU core clock and GPU utilization resulting what looks like overall throughput of 900 ghz/d instead of the potential 1450 ghz/d...

On 14 I am have 100% utilization but the overall throughput drops by 25ghz for both cards (525ghz to 500ghz) so 1000ghz/d of potential 1050ghz...

Are we hitting a memory / bus bandwidth? Asus z87-ws I7-4770S 8G DDR3-1866

Last fiddled with by NickOfTime on 2014-11-05 at 16:06
NickOfTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
gpuOwL: an OpenCL program for Mersenne primality testing preda GpuOwl 2719 2021-08-05 22:43
mfaktc: a CUDA program for Mersenne prefactoring TheJudger GPU Computing 3497 2021-06-05 12:27
LL with OpenCL msft GPU Computing 433 2019-06-23 21:11
OpenCL for FPGAs TObject GPU Computing 2 2013-10-12 21:09
Program to TF Mersenne numbers with more than 1 sextillion digits? Stargate38 Factoring 24 2011-11-03 00:34

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:06.


Fri Aug 6 01:06:08 UTC 2021 up 13 days, 19:35, 1 user, load averages: 2.37, 2.40, 2.33

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.