mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-03-24, 15:21   #1
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

72×131 Posts
Default A couple of largish numbers

I have been working on various sequences below 10^4 for a couple of years now.

3270.632 is a C170 on which I've done 16000 curves at 3e7
3678.3076 is a C162 on which I've done 20000 curves at 3e7

I have the resources to do these GNFS jobs, but not really the interest; if anyone else wants to pick up the sequences, they're welcome to them
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-24, 18:36   #2
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

A C162 is within the reach of RSALS.
But someone else would need to perform the polynomial selection: my 8 cores, on 3 computers, are currently busy with preparatory ECM work @ B1=43e6 and polynomial selection for RSALS, and some work for another BOINC-based project
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-24, 21:33   #3
Syd
 
Syd's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany

2·5·23 Posts
Default

I could do the poly selection for 3678.3076, would take me a few days to get a good one.

edit:
I'll just start it. 5 cores without cuda, one with GTX260. I'll post results here later.

Last fiddled with by Syd on 2011-03-24 at 21:49
Syd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-25, 09:36   #4
Syd
 
Syd's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany

2·5·23 Posts
Default

so far: found an outstanding poly,

Code:
# norm 1.253170e-15 alpha -8.532833 e 1.271e-12 rroots 5
skew: 133435193.68
c0:  9278864245525985137550344687245446069980225
c1:  180109282635950772896812489720834585
c2: -8995871353090924335725511063
c3: -17784552123636433957
c4:  552333312806
c5:  540
Y0: -45655070065487497189556645317254
Y1:  180378937982427677
second best is 1.063e-12
Syd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-28, 04:34   #5
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

I'll queue this polynomial onto RSALS in the next few hours.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-28, 17:24   #6
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

11110100012 Posts
Default

I have queued to RSALS the C162 from sequence 3678, with Syd's poly, over the 15M-55M range for now. There's room for a team sieving here
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-30, 06:20   #7
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

Raising the upper limit to 65M, one quarter of the 15M-65M range returned so far.
Forecast number of raw relations (over-estimated, due to simple linear projection): 81M.
Could someone give an estimation of how many raw relations are needed ?
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-31, 17:24   #8
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

I have raised the upper limit to 80M, and forced the generation of all WUs. ~54% of the 15-80M range has been returned so far, yielding a projection of ~113M raw relations.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-04-02, 10:31   #9
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

~83% of the results returned so far, ~115M raw relations expected. WUs near q=15M give lower yields than WUs at e.g. q=40M, which is infrequent.

We're currently seeing a low point in sieving activity on the grid, so I won't be participating in further team sievings until the activity raises.
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-04-02, 11:05   #10
Syd
 
Syd's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Krefeld, Germany

E616 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debrouxl View Post
~83% of the results returned so far, ~115M raw relations expected. WUs near q=15M give lower yields than WUs at e.g. q=40M, which is infrequent.

We're currently seeing a low point in sieving activity on the grid, so I won't be participating in further team sievings until the activity raises.
Maybe you can increase that activity by granting more credits to your users. Currently you grant less than average per CPU-hour, not taking the memory usage into account.

http://allprojectstats.com/cpuinfo.php?id=47029
Syd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-04-02, 17:55   #11
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

10,753 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Syd View Post
Maybe you can increase that activity by granting more credits to your users. Currently you grant less than average per CPU-hour, not taking the memory usage into account.

http://allprojectstats.com/cpuinfo.php?id=47029
Sounds like an invitation to an inflationary arms race to me...

Paul
xilman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A couple of 15e candidates fivemack NFS@Home 1 2014-11-30 07:52
new here with a couple questions theshark Information & Answers 21 2014-08-30 17:36
A couple questions from a new guy Optics Information & Answers 8 2009-04-25 18:23
Odds a largish number has N divisors? grandpascorpion Math 65 2006-02-16 15:20
A couple things PHinker Software 3 2004-12-18 17:08

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:59.


Fri Jul 16 20:59:55 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 18:47, 1 user, load averages: 1.70, 1.80, 1.85

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.