Help test 210885 - Find a new top 5000 prime! - Page 4

Kosmaj · 2004-01-14, 09:52

435-440 is almost done: no primes to 439,800

But I'd like to try one more range, and I'm taking 440-445 to test.

Kosmaj · 2004-02-06, 14:07

I completed tests of all candidates in the 435-450 range and found no primes.

I'll appreciate if Cyrix kindly tell us what' going on in his range (415-420) and when can we expect results. If there are no primes there than there is a large gap 315-450 with no primes and the next one should be around the corner. The only problem is which corner, 450 or 500k or higher :-)

cyrix · 2004-02-06, 15:07

oh,
it´s my fault... There are no more primes in my range.
i appreciate .

cyrix

Kosmaj · 2004-02-09, 00:29

Cyrix, thank you.

Now I'm taking the 455-460 range to test.

Kosmaj · 2004-02-18, 08:35

455-460 is almost done.

Ahead to the 460-465 range...

jocelynl · 2004-02-18, 12:20

I guess I could do some more testing here.
So I'll take 465-470 range.

Joss

Kosmaj · 2004-02-19, 10:08

Joss,
Welcome back to the 210885 domain

No action here recently but IMO the next prime is imminent, and it's going to be a 140,000 digits number! I just crossed the 460k boundary. I hope both me and you find primes in our respective ranges

Good luck! I wonder whether SlashDude, Thomas and/or somebody else will join the party (?) BTW, I'm going to report my first 100k digit number in a few hours

(now running the primality test) but it's not 15k.

ET_ · 2004-02-19, 12:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kosmaj

BTW, I'm going to report my first 100k digit number in a few hours

(now running the primality test) but it's not 15k.

I guess I know where it comes from... ;-)

Luigi

Kosmaj · 2004-02-27, 06:46

I'd like to reserve the 475-480 range. No primes in my range up to 464,100. It will be completed during the weekend but I must feed the client now.

Luigi, it was a General Woodall prime.

ET_ · 2004-02-27, 07:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kosmaj

Luigi, it was a General Woodall prime.

I checked it on Prime list... well done!

Luigi

Kosmaj · 2004-04-06, 01:25

After 14 ranges and more than 7500 checked candidates no new primes for k=210885... I just completed the last available range (495-500) last night. Not sure whether Slash Dude has more candidates n>500k. Even if he does I'm not sure it's a good idea to go on. True, the next prime can be at n=501k but maybe it's at n=701k. Maybe we wait for the new version of LLR supporting larger k's (?)

2004-01-14, 09:52	#34
Kosmaj Nov 2003 2·1,811 Posts	435-440 is almost done: no primes to 439,800 But I'd like to try one more range, and I'm taking 440-445 to test. Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2004-01-14 at 09:53

2004-02-19, 10:08	#40
Kosmaj Nov 2003 2×1,811 Posts	Joss, Welcome back to the 210885 domain No action here recently but IMO the next prime is imminent, and it's going to be a 140,000 digits number! I just crossed the 460k boundary. I hope both me and you find primes in our respective ranges Good luck! I wonder whether SlashDude, Thomas and/or somebody else will join the party (?) BTW, I'm going to report my first 100k digit number in a few hours (now running the primality test) but it's not 15k. Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2004-02-19 at 10:14

2004-02-27, 06:46	#42
Kosmaj Nov 2003 2·1,811 Posts	I'd like to reserve the 475-480 range. No primes in my range up to 464,100. It will be completed during the weekend but I must feed the client now. Luigi, it was a General Woodall prime. Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2004-02-27 at 06:47

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Choose your own K and work on finding a top-5000 prime!	lsoule	Riesel Prime Search	416	2021-06-28 02:03
Test a Specific Exponent in Prime95. When it is 100% done, does it mean I find a new prime number?	king	Information & Answers	5	2018-02-21 18:15
Help test 2995125705 - Find a new top 5000 prime!	SlashDude	Riesel Prime Search	538	2007-05-08 01:42
The fastest way to a top-5000 prime?	lsoule	15k Search	13	2005-09-19 20:24
Beta user stats for Phase 2 - Test of 210885	SlashDude	15k Search	1	2003-12-16 23:09

2004-02-06, 14:07	#35
Kosmaj Nov 2003 2·1,811 Posts	I completed tests of all candidates in the 435-450 range and found no primes. I'll appreciate if Cyrix kindly tell us what' going on in his range (415-420) and when can we expect results. If there are no primes there than there is a large gap 315-450 with no primes and the next one should be around the corner. The only problem is which corner, 450 or 500k or higher :-)

2004-02-06, 15:07	#36
cyrix Jul 2003 Thuringia; Germany 2·29 Posts	oh, it´s my fault... There are no more primes in my range. i appreciate . cyrix

2004-02-09, 00:29	#37
Kosmaj Nov 2003 3622₁₀ Posts	Cyrix, thank you. Now I'm taking the 455-460 range to test.

2004-02-18, 08:35	#38
Kosmaj Nov 2003 2·1,811 Posts	455-460 is almost done. Ahead to the 460-465 range...

2004-02-18, 12:20	#39
jocelynl Sep 2002 2·131 Posts	I guess I could do some more testing here. So I'll take 465-470 range. Joss

2004-04-06, 01:25	#44
Kosmaj Nov 2003 2×1,811 Posts	After 14 ranges and more than 7500 checked candidates no new primes for k=210885... I just completed the last available range (495-500) last night. Not sure whether Slash Dude has more candidates n>500k. Even if he does I'm not sure it's a good idea to go on. True, the next prime can be at n=501k but maybe it's at n=701k. Maybe we wait for the new version of LLR supporting larger k's (?)