![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
947 Posts |
Hello,
I'm thinking of upgrading the CPU on my main PC, and I'm keeping an eye to the various candidates' potential contributions to GIMPS. I currently have the Pentium Dual CPU E2200. Which of the first three processors on this chart (http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=42811,41495,33911,37251,33925,) would be the most productive in terms of LL work? I found GIMPS throughput data for some but not others. The first thing one looks at when comparing is the clock speed, of course, but I know that other factors are involved. So (for instance) is it better to go with the 3.33GHz chip that has a 2MB cache, or the 3.06GHz chip with a 3MB L2 cache? How about the 3.16GHz CPU, nominally slower than the first one but with a 6MB cache and a 1333MHz system bus? I'm not sure how to weigh these various factors against each other. Thanks for any insight you might provide! Rodrigo |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA
2·47·67 Posts |
Probably the one with 6MB cache would be best suited for GIMPS work. LL tests of the size GIMPS generally does are highly cache-bound, so I would expect the significantly extra cache of the 3.16GHz CPU to outweigh the faster clock speeds of the 3.3Ghz.
I'm not sure exactly what effect system bus speed has on LL tests, but at the very least can imagine that more is better in this case. So the 3.16Ghz CPU definitely sounds like the way to go.Note that the E8500 currently costs $200 on Newegg, the E7600 $150, and the E6800 $100. For just $100 more than the cost of the E8500, you can build an entire new system based on an AMD Athlon II X4, which, depending on which Core 2 you're comparing it to, could be a little faster or a little slower per-core, but regardless of that, would give you a lot more crunching power because of the two additional cores. (I actually put together such an example system for a friend just yesterday...if you'd like I can post the specs. You can also switch out the X4 for an X3 or X2 in the same configuration, which subtracts about $20 per core sacrificed.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
94710 Posts |
mdettweiler,
I'd be curious to see the specs on the system you built! My thinking was in terms of upgrading the CPU, but I'm *almost* at the point where I could try building a PC, and you just might tip me over the edge. Thanks much for the info on the three chips -- that was very helpful. Rodrigo |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA
2×47×67 Posts |
Okay, here's the specs:
Quote:
Note also that this configuration is fully GPU-ready: the 550W power supply should be able to handle a GTX 460 pretty well. (This power supply is actually a pretty good deal...you'd only save a few bucks by going with a 400W or 300W. Normally I would be hesitant to recommend such a cheap PSU, but I've had good results with this brand before.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Apr 2004
11·17 Posts |
I use flash drives rather than hard drives for my dedicated chrunchers, usually a 4 gig is plenty of storage for operating system and data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
947 Posts |
Quote:
That is fabulous! I'm tempted to try building my own system. We've been thinking of buying a PC to serve as a DVR ("home theater PC"), and the computer you describe would fit the bill nicely. (Except that I would get a bigger hard drive.) You don't think that running Prime95 surreptitiously alongside the TV tuner and recording functions would affect performance noticeably, do you?What OS did you put on it? Rodrigo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
947 Posts |
Quote:
When you say flash drive, do you mean a solid state drive (SSD), or an actual USB thumb drive? And if it's a thumb drive, if not OS or data then what do you do with (or put on) the hard disk? I'd be curious to see the specs on this system! Rodrigo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA
629810 Posts |
Quote:
One thing I forgot to mention earlier is that for about $100 more, you can get a Phenom II X6 CPU (the 1055T is the cheapest, though for just a bit more you can get its more upscale cousins with progressively higher clock speed). Right now, the X6's are really the best "bang for the buck" out there when it comes to crunching power. The only reason why I didn't include it in the above listing is because my goal was to see "how cheap can you build a decent PC for?". If the extra $100 is within your price range, I would definitely swap out the X4 for an X6 (it will also work with the same configuration) considering how much additional power you get. Regarding OS, FYI I didn't actually build this machine (or even buy any of the parts); I put it together as an entirely hypothetical exercise. So I didn't give much consideration to the OS. For a dedicated crunching machine, I would recommend Linux (Ubuntu is a good, easy distribution if you're not too familiar with Linux); but for a home theater PC you'd want to go with Windows 7, probably Home Premium version. And, of course, whatever the OS, definitely get a 64-bit version, as nowadays those can do anything a 32-bit version can and they're rather faster on TF (a little faster on LL-like work too, IIRC, though not as much so).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA
11000100110102 Posts |
Quote:
Note that most of the cheaper SSDs available have a 2.5" form factor, rather than the standard 3.5" that desktop hard drives usually have, so that they can fit in laptops as well. You'd need to get spacers (you can probably pick them up from your local computer store very cheaply) to fit them into a desktop chassis. The cable connections, though, should be compatible since it's SATA. (If it was IDE, you'd need an adapter as laptops use a different kind of IDE interface.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
947 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Rodrigo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
254738 Posts |
A USB thumb drive. Most modern BIOS'es can boot from the thumb. They are way cheaper than a mechanical and use less power. If the machine is networked the critical data can be backed up easy. If you can boot from LAN, then you don't need that either. PrimeMonster used to boot a *nix from LAN and ran it from a RAM drive. Each node had a spot on the server's HDD for data storage.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CPUs assigned | houding | Hardware | 10 | 2015-03-25 00:33 |
| Number of CPUs to use | houding | Software | 3 | 2015-02-26 19:56 |
| cpus running at 10% | wildrabbitt | Information & Answers | 9 | 2015-01-20 13:31 |
| Whither Older CPUs? | Rodrigo | Operation Billion Digits | 4 | 2010-10-20 15:12 |
| A tale of 3 CPUs | chris2be8 | Hardware | 7 | 2010-07-20 23:12 |