![]() |
|
|
#452 |
|
"William"
May 2003
New Haven
2·7·132 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#453 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"𒉺𒌌𒇷𒆷ð’€"
May 2003
Down not across
2·5,393 Posts |
Quote:
Paul Last fiddled with by xilman on 2011-08-27 at 15:06 |
|
|
|
|
|
#454 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
19·613 Posts |
So Bernanke gave his much-awaited annual Jackson Hole speech yesterday. It was really "a speech about nothing" in that it was utterly devoid of anything remotely surprising. BB basically admitted "economy still sucks", made vague claims about the Fed "not being out of bullets" - a lie, but even if the Fed still has "things it can try", it's not as if any of its previous efforts have succeeded at anything but sponsoring another round of idiotic risk-taking by Big Finance - and hinted at "further measures possible" while committing to nothing. The only sign that anyone cared was an immediate low-volume ramp in US equities which had "HFT intervention" written all over it. I was offline all day, but fully intend to take advantage of any further government-sponsored levitation next week by going short, and this time not in small fashion. Financial markets around the world are flashing warnings of extreme events dead ahead, and I don't mean "extreme upside" events.
One ZH reader summed up "market" reaction to BB's speech pithily: Bernank sponsored equity boner for Fraud Street". By way of an aside, Jackson Hole is a truly lovely place, I encourage readers who have not already been there to add a visit to their bucket list. Try to go during the 360+ days of each year when JH happens to not be overrun by global-financial-engineering types: Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 2011-08-27 at 22:31 |
|
|
|
|
#455 |
|
Aug 2003
Snicker, AL
95910 Posts |
Distinctly off topic, but I agree re Jackson Hole. There are some outstanding nearby attractions such as the the Elk Preserve, Grand Tetons, and Yellowstone. It is also not far to Dinosaur National Monument. If you have an opportunity, this is an outstandingly beautiful region to visit. Please note that the JH/Yellowstone area generally is snowbound sometime in October so plan accordingly.
More on topic, there is growing recognition that QE has triggered an uptick in inflation. It is easily shown that the govt measure of inflation shows little to none, but if you go to a grocery store, you will see it in action. The current rise in food prices is insidious. I'm curious if anyone can show that inflation has a very specific effect in transferring the cost of living from one generation to another and how that effect works. DarJones Last fiddled with by Fusion_power on 2011-08-28 at 20:51 |
|
|
|
|
#456 |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
5×359 Posts |
Well, if you are a wage earner, and your wages follow inflation, with a lag, you pay a small price for inflation. If you are a retiree, and the value of your investment dividends fall with inflation, you pay a bigger price for inflation.
Inflation encourages spending of money in the short term, rather than saving it for the long term, since inflation will destroy the value of savings. That is, it encourages available money to be spent on something real that can be had today, and (hopefully) will have value tomorrow, over transferring the decision to, say, a banker or stock market as it would be if cash were saved or invested. |
|
|
|
|
#457 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
19×613 Posts |
A friend from Oz sent me the link to this Australian-real-estate-centric blog posting, which I found quite interesting:
Real House Price Index Update | WhoCrashedTheEconomy Compared to the flat-out insane valuations in Oz, U.S. housing looks downright affordable, though I would gauge that we still have 15-20% to fall before getting back to the long-term trendline, and of course that ignores the huge shadow inventory of properties still held off-market by the banks, which will be a drag on prices for years, and would need a downward price-overcorrection (which is what markets tend to do unless propped up by external forces, e.g. government intervention) to clear more quickly. Now, despite the glaringly-evident bubble-spike in US home prices from 2000-2006, Ben Bernanke is on record saying that "bubbles are hard to spot in real time". So instead of leaping to a hasty "Oz is in a huge bubble which is beginning to deflate catastrophically" conclusion, let's ask the readership: Oz home prices in a bubble, or just taking a little breather on their way up to a "permanently high plateau". [Google that phrase with quotes and you'll get some quite-interesting links.] |
|
|
|
|
#458 | |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
111000000112 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#459 | |
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
10001111012 Posts |
Quote:
Regardless, I'll go with "it's a bubble" - but very unlikely to deflate catastrophically, more likely a slower decline in real terms, and fairly likely in numbers-of-$ as well.Firstly supply & demand: the amount of new land becoming available for housing around our major cities has not kept pace with population growth (including significant immigration) for several years now. Secondly borrowers here can't just walk away from their mortgage: if they're under water on the loan there's a strong tendency to sit it out & hope the market improves before they have to sell. The alternative is a personal loss, possibly even bankruptcy. Forced sales by the lender are fairly rare (subjective - IMHO) although increasing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#460 |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
5×359 Posts |
Being underwater isn't what makes most walk away from loans...it's simply being unable to make the payments.
In the US, we got into a situation where houses would appreciate, in terms of the resale value, to the point where you could sell your house, make a down payment on a bigger one, and use the excess to pay the new, larger mortgage for a few years. Works fine until your measly salary has to actually make the monthly mortgage payments. |
|
|
|
|
#461 | ||
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
3·191 Posts |
Today's news down here in Australia included this timely release - two sources supplied to give me more choice of quotes to cherry-pick.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#462 |
|
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney
3·191 Posts |
True, but the consequences are different so people's thresholds are different - there is more incentive to hang in there longer scrimping more or ask family for help if most of the loss would be one's own rather than the bank's.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mystery Economic Theater 2018-2019 | ewmayer | Soap Box | 156 | 2019-12-14 22:39 |
| Mystery Economic Theater 2017 | ewmayer | Soap Box | 42 | 2017-12-30 06:07 |
| Mystery Economic Theater 2016 | ewmayer | Soap Box | 90 | 2017-01-01 01:46 |
| Mystery Economic Theater 2015 | ewmayer | Soap Box | 200 | 2015-12-31 22:49 |
| Mystery Economic Theater 2010 | ewmayer | Soap Box | 827 | 2010-12-31 08:41 |