![]() |
|
|
#210 | |
|
May 2004
New York City
5·7·112 Posts |
Quote:
The other conjectures don't start with this, and contradict it. Hence since mine is probably true, yours is just wrong, hence weak. I don't use your terminology of "stronger" or "weaker". Our conjectures are not in any measure equivalent. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Searching for Wagstaff PRP | T.Rex | Wagstaff PRP Search | 191 | 2021-06-30 17:22 |
| New Wagstaff PRP exponents | ryanp | Wagstaff PRP Search | 26 | 2013-10-18 01:33 |
| 500€ Reward for a proof for the Wagstaff primality test conjecture | Tony Reix | Wagstaff PRP Search | 7 | 2013-10-10 01:23 |
| Hot tuna! -- a p75 and a p79 by Sam Wagstaff! | Batalov | GMP-ECM | 9 | 2012-08-24 10:26 |
| 30th Wagstaff prime | T.Rex | Math | 0 | 2007-09-04 07:10 |