mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Miscellaneous Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-01-23, 23:50   #210
davar55
 
davar55's Avatar
 
May 2004
New York City

5·7·112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
Uh, yeah I got that. I was asking you in particular which of the following you think is true:
1. Yours is stronger than mine (yours implies mine, mine does not imply yours)
2. Mine is stronger than yours (reverse of above)
3. Yours is equivalent to mine
4. None of the above
My YJ-Conjecture begins with (1) the ratios are bounded above.

The other conjectures don't start with this, and contradict it.

Hence since mine is probably true, yours is just wrong, hence weak.
I don't use your terminology of "stronger" or "weaker".
Our conjectures are not in any measure equivalent.
davar55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Searching for Wagstaff PRP T.Rex Wagstaff PRP Search 191 2021-06-30 17:22
New Wagstaff PRP exponents ryanp Wagstaff PRP Search 26 2013-10-18 01:33
500€ Reward for a proof for the Wagstaff primality test conjecture Tony Reix Wagstaff PRP Search 7 2013-10-10 01:23
Hot tuna! -- a p75 and a p79 by Sam Wagstaff! Batalov GMP-ECM 9 2012-08-24 10:26
30th Wagstaff prime T.Rex Math 0 2007-09-04 07:10

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:27.


Fri Aug 6 23:27:05 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 17:56, 1 user, load averages: 3.92, 4.04, 4.04

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.