mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Factoring

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-12-16, 14:33   #12
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

2×5,393 Posts
Default All your base are belong to us

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
The Cunninghams are all repunits. Just in different bases.
All composite numbers are repunits. Just in different bases.

Last fiddled with by xilman on 2010-12-16 at 14:34 Reason: Add title
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-16, 15:48   #13
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

17·251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
All composite numbers are repunits. Just in different bases.
Not just composite numbers. n=11n-1
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-16, 16:19   #14
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

101010001000102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
Not just composite numbers. n=11n-1
The discussion was in the context of factoring. Factoring primes is rather trivial.

My original intent was to say "all numbers", carefully being sloppy in identifying "numbers" with the rings Z or N , but the statement is no longer true for abs(n) < 3. Rather than unduly complicating matters, I chose to restrict my statement to composite numbers.


Paul

Last fiddled with by xilman on 2010-12-16 at 22:37 Reason: Fix tyop
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-16, 19:46   #15
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
All composite numbers are repunits. Just in different bases.
Representing N in base N isn't very interesting...........
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-16, 20:04   #16
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

5,087 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Representing N in base N isn't very interesting...........
Aha! N = 11(base N-1)! There. That _must_ be interesting
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-12-17, 07:34   #17
wreck
 
wreck's Avatar
 
"Bo Chen"
Oct 2005
Wuhan,China

101010002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by juno1369 View Post
I am not going to factor both these numbers because my laptop keeps restarting automatically and sometimes shutting down itself when I run polyselect. I leave these two numbers for someone else to factor.
If the polynomial is the only problem you meet, you can have a try to the snfs.
The easiest one is 10^405-1, and its poly is
Code:
n: 3517412599793609476455168711048853577877869285903909511672490597786154396101045678221196660571883869013967834755445386746946314375802833469406378013185319317311967782209292276167648593890678001
# 10^405-1, difficulty: 216.00, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.68
# cost: 5.52232e+17, est. time: 262.97 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 1.000
c4: 1
c3: -1
c2: -4
c1: 4
c0: 1
Y1: -1000000000000000000000000000
Y0: 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
m: 3516412599793609476455168711049853577877869285903909511672490597786154396101045678220196660571883869013967834756445386746946314375802833468406378013185319317311967783209292276167648593890678002
type: snfs
This number would take about 15000 CPU hours.
wreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-02-04, 22:24   #18
fwjmath
 

3×5×41 Posts
Default

After nearly 4 months' effort, we just brought down this c159 and split it into two pieces.
Code:
c159=p79*p81

with

p79=3925277248426748966984537733816767395325307476622633188305245093834818012069881

p81=130547462818138630777456508666491939964821812774903307594092374520935816757936709
These primes are certified with Primo.

We used the polynomial that wreck mentioned. This number took ~62M relations to factor. It produced a 7.4M*7.4M matrix and took 168h on a P7450 to do linear algebra (with 2 threads).

This is a joint effort by myself, pchu, wreck and wpolly.

And now finally I can turn back to some other volunteer computing project...

fwjmath
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFS sieving? Dubslow Factoring 8 2012-09-28 06:47
Line sieving vs. lattice sieving JHansen NFSNET Discussion 9 2010-06-09 19:25
10^420 + 1 sieving juno1369 Factoring 20 2010-04-28 01:11
Sieving OmbooHankvald Prime Sierpinski Project 4 2005-06-30 07:51
Sieving robert44444uk Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 8 2005-04-02 22:30

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:28.


Fri Aug 6 23:28:59 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 17:57, 1 user, load averages: 3.38, 3.78, 3.93

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.