mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2003-11-18, 15:08   #1
edorajh
 
edorajh's Avatar
 
Oct 2003
Croatia

23×3×19 Posts
Default Intel Celeron 700 MHz?

I just borged friends computer at work (with permision ). It is Intel Celeron 700 MHz, with 256 Mb RAM. I choose primality test as my prefered type of work. And I get exponent for first time primality test (in 20.3M range). Now, I'm not sure if I did good choice. Am I allowed to run first time primality test with machines that have less than 1 GHz?

It will take 208 days to complete current test. I'm OK with that, but can it hurt the project goals?
edorajh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 17:29   #2
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

24·173 Posts
Default

You can test whatever you want. There is nothing wrong with putting a Celeron on first time testing. If the 208 days completion date puts you off you can try doublechecking or factoring. But that won't find you a prime. At the same time, Celerons are best at factoring.

Its your choice.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 19:17   #3
pakaran
 
pakaran's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

3·83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by garo
You can test whatever you want. There is nothing wrong with putting a Celeron on first time testing. If the 208 days completion date puts you off you can try doublechecking or factoring. But that won't find you a prime. At the same time, Celerons are best at factoring.

Its your choice.
What I wouldn't do is delibarately try for small re-released exponents with a machine like that.
pakaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 20:00   #4
edorajh
 
edorajh's Avatar
 
Oct 2003
Croatia

1110010002 Posts
Default

Thanks for answers!

Quote:
Originally posted by pakaran
What I wouldn't do is delibarately try for small re-released exponents with a machine like that.
I wouldn't do anything deliberately. I leave PrimeNet server to assign exponents to me.
edorajh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 20:14   #5
pakaran
 
pakaran's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

3·83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by edorajh
Thanks for answers!



I wouldn't do anything deliberately. I leave PrimeNet server to assign exponents to me.
Then you should be good, as long as you're patient.
pakaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 21:24   #6
edorajh
 
edorajh's Avatar
 
Oct 2003
Croatia

23·3·19 Posts
Default

I will be patient because my other machines are in 1.6 GHz range. So I will have lots of exponents tested in those 208 days, with other machines. This small Celeron is just small addition to my fleet. It's better that it crunch one exponent in 208 days than not crunching anything.

Last fiddled with by edorajh on 2003-11-18 at 21:29
edorajh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 21:43   #7
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

17×487 Posts
Default

Make sure you do backups every now and then.

Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2003-11-18 at 21:43
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 22:35   #8
edorajh
 
edorajh's Avatar
 
Oct 2003
Croatia

23×3×19 Posts
Default

I plan to copy files every week, or every two week, just in case something happens to friend's machine, or in case he get new one.

I'm not quite sure what files I should copy so I can resume work on some other machine if anything happens to this one?
edorajh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 22:59   #9
outlnder
 
outlnder's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

2×3×53 Posts
Default

Copy the pxxxxxxx and qxxxxxxx files. These are the progress files, with qxxxxxxx being the backup.

You might also copy the .ini files and the results.txt file.
outlnder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-18, 23:12   #10
E_tron
 
E_tron's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Austin, TX

3×11×17 Posts
Default

Because it is a celeron (with 128kbytes of L2 cashe right?) it will be slower on larger exponents compared to a P3 @ 700mhz. I would recommend making it do Double Check work, because it would have more throughput that way.
E_tron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-11-19, 11:07   #11
edorajh
 
edorajh's Avatar
 
Oct 2003
Croatia

23×3×19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by E_tron
Because it is a celeron (with 128kbytes of L2 cashe right?) it will be slower on larger exponents compared to a P3 @ 700mhz. I would recommend making it do Double Check work, because it would have more throughput that way.
I think it is wise to follow your advice. Especialy if that could be more helpful to the project. So I change prefered assignments for that machine to double checking.

Thanks for help!
edorajh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Celeron 2.40 too slow? rudi_m Hardware 14 2005-10-11 03:31
Celeron D; The new Prime95 CPU of choice? E_tron Hardware 17 2005-01-27 02:49
New celeron. look, look! E_tron Hardware 5 2004-07-13 05:16
Benchmark: P4 and P4 Celeron E_tron Hardware 3 2003-11-20 18:31
Celeron vs. P4 PrimeCruncher Hardware 7 2003-11-14 02:19

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:12.


Fri Jul 7 16:12:31 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 13:41, 0 users, load averages: 2.02, 1.54, 1.29

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔