![]() |
|
|
#133 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24×397 Posts |
I just added another feature to the unproven page, filtering. Take a look and let me know what you think. I intend to use it to help me choose future conjectures to work on.
Last fiddled with by rogue on 2012-03-07 at 22:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
11000011010012 Posts |
Big surprise: Mark's new stats scripts are now online!
I had a few minutes today sitting in front of the computer and figured "hmm, I really should do this already..." and now 10 minutes later it's done. ![]() Yeah, gee...this has been sitting for five months and IT'S A STINKING 10 MINUTE JOB! Out of sight, out of mind, you know? Thanks Mathew for the little reminder this morning--this should have been done a long time ago. To review (and to confirm that I didn't forget anything), the new script generates four pages, crus-stats.htm, crus-top20.htm, crus-proven.htm, and crus-unproven.htm. Each of these are now linked from the main CRUS page: http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/ The script runs hourly at :30. Sorry everyone for the wait on this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11000110100002 Posts |
Thanks Max!
I see that the top Riesel in this list: Top 20 Conjectures with 1k Remaining by Lowest Weight, has a negative weight and there are a number on the Unproven Conjectures page with a negative weight. Max, did you delete the temp files that were there before installing the scripts? I wonder if a bad value was picked up from old data. The other possibility is that you are using an older version of srsieve. I am using 1.0.3. |
|
|
|
|
|
#136 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
![]() I downloaded the latest srsieve 1.0.4 package from your website and tried compiling it on jeepford (Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit), but got this error: Code:
gcc -m64 -s srsieve.o arithmetic32.o arithmetic64.o bitmap.o bsgs.o clock.o events.o factors.o files.o global.o hashtable.o primes.o sequences.o subseq.o util.o priority.o powmod-k8.o -lm -o srsieve bsgs.o: In function `bsgs64_noflt': bsgs.c:(.text+0x294b): undefined reference to `_powmod64_k8' bsgs.c:(.text+0x296c): undefined reference to `_powmod64_k8' bsgs.c:(.text+0x29cc): undefined reference to `_powmod64_k8' bsgs.o: In function `bsgs64_flt': bsgs.c:(.text+0x2d47): undefined reference to `_powmod64_k8' bsgs.c:(.text+0x2d68): undefined reference to `_powmod64_k8' bsgs.o:bsgs.c:(.text+0x2f29): more undefined references to `_powmod64_k8' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [srsieve] Error 1 Edit: I do have an srsieve 0.6.17 binary on hand; will that do or does the script rely on any of the features you added later? Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2012-08-20 at 00:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
24×397 Posts |
Quote:
Have you tried a 32-bit build? I wonder if that has the same problem. You will need 1.0.3 or 1.0.4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
), but it gave me a different error:Code:
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -march=k8 -m64 -Wall -DHAVE_CMOV -DUSE_ASM -DNDEBUG -c -o srsieve.o srsieve.c
In file included from /usr/include/assert.h:37:0,
from srsieve.c:11:
/usr/include/features.h:323:26: fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [srsieve.o] Error 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
624910 Posts |
Mathew just sent me his 64-bit Linux build of srsieve; however, it's not working either:
Code:
gary@jeepford:/home/nplb/html/crus/vstats_new$ ./srsieve -v ./srsieve: /lib/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./srsieve)
Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2012-08-20 at 05:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101×103 Posts |
Max,
I've sieved a fair amount on Jeepford. There should be several older versions of sr(x)sieve that work on it. Just look in the "Prime" folder on the desktop. Then look in any of the "primex" folders within that. You should see folders for srsieve, sr1sieve, and sr2sieve. The only problem is that they are old enough that they probably wouldn't remove the n's with algebraic factors like the more recent versions of srsieve would. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
5,881 Posts |
Quote:
In powmod-k8.S, #define powmod64_k8 _powmod64_k8 is not being called when it is needed since NEED_UNDERSCORE is not defined. I removed that #if and its #endif and it compiled for me. Obviously there might be a less hackish fix but it seems to work for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
18D016 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by rogue on 2012-08-20 at 13:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
624910 Posts |
Quote:
The negative weights seem to be fixed now--a quick Ctrl-F search through the Top 20 page showed no "-" characters except those in the "even-n" and "odd-n" wordings. (BTW, if anyone needs an srsieve 1.0.4 binary that runs on old(ish) 64-bit Linuxes, feel free to snarf the one I just built out of the script folder. )
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sieving for CRUS | rebirther | Conjectures 'R Us | 638 | 2021-06-15 07:55 |
| BOINC effort for CRUS | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 75 | 2015-06-17 14:25 |
| What are your CRUS plans? | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 35 | 2013-11-09 09:03 |
| how high will CRUS go | Mini-Geek | Conjectures 'R Us | 1 | 2010-11-08 20:50 |
| CSVs for stats available + New combined stats | opyrt | Prime Sierpinski Project | 3 | 2010-05-31 08:13 |