![]() |
|
|
#871 |
|
Sep 2010
Scandinavia
11478 Posts |
The smooth ones have already been found with P-1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#872 |
|
"Oliver"
Mar 2005
Germany
5×223 Posts |
yep, they are found with P-1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#873 | |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
110001011102 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#874 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
41·251 Posts |
I digested what the server gave me.
I have stopped anyhow, after I found that factor, and concentrate now on DCTF, after the last arguments in the GPU72 thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#875 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
2×7×113 Posts |
That´s right, exponents handed by the server for ECM are in the 9M range. I wonder why so high. That´s why I get them manually.
Just out of curiosity, when you say you gave up ECM to concentrate on DCTF does that mean you are moving CPU(s) to DCTF, or you were using some program that would allow running ECM on a GPU? Or...? |
|
|
|
|
|
#876 |
|
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands
32×131 Posts |
IIRC 2^1018-1 is still the maximum GPU-ECM can handle.
The difficulty with determining the desired TF level before running ECM lies with the differences in CPU and GPU capabilities and available resources. On ECM candidates with no (or very few) curves you MIGHT be better off running TF a bit deeper IF you have the GPU resources available (which should really be doing DCTF and LLTF). I personally wouldn't recommend running TF on anything <10M, since most of those have had a fair share of P-1 and ECM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#877 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
158210 Posts |
Look at this one:
ECM found a factor in curve #181, stage #2 Sigma=3947118002300977, B1=250000, B2=25000000. UID: lycorn/asteroid, M507149 has a factor: 1834049842474634749280697499913 (ECM curve 181, B1=250000, B2=25000000) Factor is prime, and its k=22 × 452049063114251124738661 Only ECM could have found it... |
|
|
|
|
|
#878 |
|
Jun 2014
23·3·5 Posts |
M70637093 has a factor: 27886899376721683540674433 (84.5 bits)
k=26 × 33 × 7 × 11 × 13 × 23 × 7877 × 629899 k is pretty smooth and has a lot of very small factors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#879 |
|
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands
32·131 Posts |
A nice P-1 stage 1 factor popped up yesterday 91.5 bits (28 digits):
P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=1500000. UID: VictordeHollander/PCVICTOR, M68842181 has a factor: 3483933495938630920516781759 (P-1, B1=1500000) k = 25303770488754786259 = 7 × 11 × 977 × 12641 × 26777 × 993703 |
|
|
|
|
|
#880 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
First a 2^2 * prime k, then an odd k...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sorry about last post I hope u like this new factor method | ONeil | ONeil | 4 | 2021-01-02 20:01 |
| Factor found that should have been found by P-1 | tha | Data | 65 | 2020-08-05 21:11 |
| 10 fold increase in new CPU's | Uncwilly | PrimeNet | 10 | 2019-11-13 18:18 |
| POST PRIMES you've found here, and name or prover code | TTn | 15k Search | 415 | 2006-03-02 21:17 |
| Post the numbers you have tried to factor here | hyh1048576 | Factoring | 11 | 2003-12-01 07:37 |