PFGW 4.0.4 (with gwnum v30.10) Released - Page 47

Cybertronic · 2021-10-18, 14:00

Oh ! You have right....so I try it again...(wieder was gelernt!)

Yes, I did it.

WOW, kruoli is the BEST !

E:\pfgw_win_3.8.3>pfgw64 -N -tc -hhelper.ini -x1994 cousin.in
PFGW Version 3.8.3.64BIT.20161203.Win_Dev [GWNUM 28.6]

***WARNING! file cousin.in may have already been fully processed.

Primality testing (520461*2^55931+1)*(43439253939*(520461*2^55931-1)^2-3)+1 [N-1/N+1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfrid
Reading factors from helper file helper.ini
Running N-1 test using base 5
Running N-1 test using base 13
Running N+1 test using discriminant 29, base 3+sqrt(29)
(520461*2^55931+1)*(43439253939*(520461*2^55931-1)^2-3)+1 is prime! (792.9199s+0.0050s)

Puzzle-Peter · 2021-10-18, 16:13

I remember having a similar problem with a snippet of C code somebody postet here in the forum. It just wouldn't compile and the error messages were not helpful at all. In the end I opened a new file and entered the code manually ( just a few lines, luckily) - it worked.

Wow, that was a tough one. Thanks everybody for helping!

Cybertronic · 2021-10-18, 17:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puzzle-Peter

I remember having a similar problem with a snippet of C code somebody postet here in the forum. It just wouldn't compile and the error messages were not helpful at all. In the end I opened a new file and entered the code manually ( just a few lines, luckily) - it worked.

Wow, that was a tough one. Thanks everybody for helping!

Yes, many thanks !!!

rogue · 2022-01-21, 23:38

Does anyone use the GUI version of pfgw on Windows? I am considering dropping support of it.

a1call · 2022-01-21, 23:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogue

Does anyone use the GUI version of pfgw on Windows? I am considering dropping support of it.

Pas moi.

I have been using the Terminal/Shell version on Windows 24/7 for close to a year now. No Mega-Primes yet.

rogue · 2022-07-18, 14:14

I have posted pfgw 4.0.3 over at sourceforge.

The only change is a new -A option for setting CPU affinity on Windows. I have not made the changes necessary to support this on linux or OS X.

PRPNet 5.4.6 was updated last week so setting cpuaffinity= in prpclient.ini will set -A for pfgw.

pepi37 · 2022-07-19, 07:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogue

Does anyone use the GUI version of pfgw on Windows? I am considering dropping support of it.

Release this version with GUI , please!

When you download file from source forge you got pfgw_win_4.0.3. Windows cannot open it since it miss extension .7z :)

rebirther · 2022-07-19, 07:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by pepi37

Release this version with GUI , please!

When you download file from source forge you got pfgw_win_4.0.3. Windows cannot open it since it miss extension .7z :)

The same, you need to rename file to .7z, GUI is still in there and Iam using it.

rogue · 2022-07-19, 12:33

I have used .7z for years as it compresses much better than .zip. Install 7-zip or any of the other free tools that support the .7z extension.

The file on sourceforge has .7z in its name. I assume you are hiding file extensions for known extensions in Windows.

bbb120 · 2022-09-14, 05:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogue

Does anyone use the GUI version of pfgw on Windows? I am considering dropping support of it.

I use GUI on windows 7.
but pfgw support baillie-psw primality test?????

VBCurtis · 2022-09-14, 05:53

You don't even use the software! How do you know you want the GUI rather than the much-more-useful command line?

2021-10-18, 14:00	#507
Cybertronic Jan 2007 Germany 3·239 Posts	Oh ! You have right....so I try it again...(wieder was gelernt!) Yes, I did it. WOW, kruoli is the BEST ! E:\pfgw_win_3.8.3>pfgw64 -N -tc -hhelper.ini -x1994 cousin.in PFGW Version 3.8.3.64BIT.20161203.Win_Dev [GWNUM 28.6] **WARNING! file cousin.in may have already been fully processed. Primality testing (5204612^55931+1)(43439253939(5204612^55931-1)^2-3)+1 [N-1/N+1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfrid Reading factors from helper file helper.ini Running N-1 test using base 5 Running N-1 test using base 13 Running N+1 test using discriminant 29, base 3+sqrt(29) (5204612^55931+1)(43439253939(5204612^55931-1)^2-3)+1 is prime! (792.9199s+0.0050s) Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2021-10-18 at 14:13*

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
A possible bug in LLR/PFGW while using GWNUM (no bug in P95)	Batalov	Software	77	2015-04-14 09:01
PFGW 3.2.0 has been Released	rogue	Software	94	2010-09-14 21:39
PFGW 3.2.3 has been Released	rogue	Software	10	2009-10-28 07:07
PFGW 3.2.1 has been released	rogue	Software	5	2009-08-10 01:43
PFGW 3.1.0 has been Released	rogue	Software	25	2009-07-21 18:13

2021-10-18, 16:13	#508
Puzzle-Peter Jun 2009 1274₈ Posts	I remember having a similar problem with a snippet of C code somebody postet here in the forum. It just wouldn't compile and the error messages were not helpful at all. In the end I opened a new file and entered the code manually ( just a few lines, luckily) - it worked. Wow, that was a tough one. Thanks everybody for helping!

2022-01-21, 23:38	#510
rogue "Mark" Apr 2003 Between here and the 1110010101101₂ Posts	Does anyone use the GUI version of pfgw on Windows? I am considering dropping support of it.

2022-07-18, 14:14	#512
rogue "Mark" Apr 2003 Between here and the 3·2,447 Posts	I have posted pfgw 4.0.3 over at sourceforge. The only change is a new -A option for setting CPU affinity on Windows. I have not made the changes necessary to support this on linux or OS X. PRPNet 5.4.6 was updated last week so setting cpuaffinity= in prpclient.ini will set -A for pfgw.

2022-07-19, 12:33	#515
rogue "Mark" Apr 2003 Between here and the 16255₈ Posts	I have used .7z for years as it compresses much better than .zip. Install 7-zip or any of the other free tools that support the .7z extension. The file on sourceforge has .7z in its name. I assume you are hiding file extensions for known extensions in Windows.

2022-09-14, 05:53	#517
VBCurtis "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 2×2,927 Posts	You don't even use the software! How do you know you want the GUI rather than the much-more-useful command line?