mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2013-07-30, 10:10   #815
ckdo
 
ckdo's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany

2×5×53 Posts
Default

So the trial factoring wavefront hit 99M today. I'd say it's about time to add a bit or two starting at 66M or some such, again...
ckdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-07-30, 12:46   #816
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2·3·1,693 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ckdo View Post
So the trial factoring wavefront hit 99M today. I'd say it's about time to add a bit or two starting at 66M or some such, again...
Batten Down the Hatches!
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-01, 05:36   #817
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

100110011100102 Posts
Default

All exponents below 26,114,633 have been tested and double-checked.
All exponents below 44,457,869 have been tested at least once.

Countdown to testing all exponents below M(57885161) once: 27,967

Countdown to proving M(30402457) is the 43rd Mersenne Prime: 1,832
Countdown to proving M(32582657) is the 44rd Mersenne Prime: 29,915

Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2013-08-01 at 05:37 Reason: fur matting
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-07, 18:58   #818
Primeinator
 
Primeinator's Avatar
 
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..

3·5·61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
All exponents below 26,114,633 have been tested and double-checked.
All exponents below 44,457,869 have been tested at least once.

Countdown to testing all exponents below M(57885161) once: 27,967

Countdown to proving M(30402457) is the 43rd Mersenne Prime: 1,832
Countdown to proving M(32582657) is the 44rd Mersenne Prime: 29,915
Is your point that there is a greater need for LL testing (especially LL double checks) than there is for trial factoring to higher bit levels? I'm not taking sides, just inquiring. I'm as ignorant as they come on this forum in regards to the best way to achieve project efficacy and unity.
Primeinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-07, 19:55   #819
c10ck3r
 
c10ck3r's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Kansas

54710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Primeinator View Post
Is your point that there is a greater need for LL testing (especially LL double checks) than there is for trial factoring to higher bit levels? I'm not taking sides, just inquiring. I'm as ignorant as they come on this forum in regards to the best way to achieve project efficacy and unity.
AFAICT, this is solely a monthly status update on the progress made towards eliminating potential mersenne prime candidates below a given threshold.
c10ck3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-07, 22:42   #820
Primeinator
 
Primeinator's Avatar
 
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..

3×5×61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c10ck3r View Post
AFAICT, this is solely a monthly status update on the progress made towards eliminating potential mersenne prime candidates below a given threshold.
I guess I should have been more clear with my question. I realized it was from the Results Query and I just assumed that it was a "read between the lines" type posting. I probably thought that because of the above posting about "battening down the hatches" and that some flame war was about to begin.
Primeinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-07, 23:07   #821
TheMawn
 
TheMawn's Avatar
 
May 2013
East. Always East.

6BF16 Posts
Default

I hear trial factoring is just barely keeping up with the LL wavefront. I'm sure it wouldn't be the end of the world if for a month all Makes SenseTM assignments could be double-checks instead.
TheMawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-08, 00:01   #822
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2·7·19·37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Primeinator View Post
Is your point that there is a greater need for LL testing (especially LL double checks) than there is for trial factoring to higher bit levels?
Quote:
Originally Posted by c10ck3r View Post
AFAICT, this is solely a monthly status update on the progress made towards eliminating potential mersenne prime candidates below a given threshold.
More like that. I have generally waited until we were 1/2 way closer to one or more goals than the last posting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primeinator View Post
I guess I should have been more clear with my question. I realized it was from the Results Query and I just assumed that it was a "read between the lines" type posting. I probably thought that because of the above posting about "battening down the hatches" and that some flame war was about to begin.
I just want to capture a "were we are" on the milestones every month or two. The "battening down the hatches" I think refers to a habit to incitement of another member of the forum.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-08, 05:29   #823
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2·3·1,693 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
[SNIP] The "battening down the hatches" I think refers to a habit to incitement of another member of the forum.
And, it turns out, said member is on a "time out", or possibly in moderation restraints.

EDIT: Speaking of time outs, I now wish I could turn off the smilies-with-mauls animation in the facetious post above. 'twould be nice if such things would run for a bit and then "time out".

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-08-08 at 05:37
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-11, 11:14   #824
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

22×691 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMawn View Post
I hear trial factoring is just barely keeping up with the LL wavefront. I'm sure it wouldn't be the end of the world if for a month all Makes SenseTM assignments could be double-checks instead.
I think that is more due to GPU72 holding everything from 61m upwards to make sure everything gets TFed to 74 bits before being handed out for LL testing. The thought process being it is better to hand out a 65M with TF to 74 bits than a 61M with TF done to 73 bits. If we find TF is lagging behind I think we could just throw back any 61M or 62M exponents into the LL pool and be fine. No need to mess with the What Makes Sense setting.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-08-12, 07:33   #825
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22×3×641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Primeinator View Post
Is your point that there is a greater need for LL testing (especially LL double checks) than there is for trial factoring to higher bit levels?
Sometimes a status report is just a status report.
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newer X64 build needed Googulator Msieve 73 2020-08-30 07:47
Performance of cuda-ecm on newer hardware? fivemack GMP-ECM 14 2015-02-12 20:10
Cause this don't belong in the milestone thread bcp19 Data 30 2012-09-08 15:09
Newer msieves are slow on Core i7 mklasson Msieve 9 2009-02-18 12:58
Use of large memory pages possible with newer linux kernels Dresdenboy Software 3 2003-12-08 14:47

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:51.


Fri Aug 6 08:51:06 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 3:20, 1 user, load averages: 2.66, 2.55, 2.67

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.