Newer milestone thread - Page 47

c10ck3r · 2012-06-12, 20:30

I *imagine* below 10k will have "special attention" paid to it, leaving us with 990k for this project. Does anyone have a way to generate a pminus1= format worktodo.txt for exp<1M and B1<10M without all the hassle of manually typing it?

petrw1 · 2012-06-12, 21:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by c10ck3r

I *imagine* below 10k will have "special attention" paid to it, leaving us with 990k for this project. Does anyone have a way to generate a pminus1= format worktodo.txt for exp<1M and B1<10M without all the hassle of manually typing it?

Did you try here:
http://mersenne-aries.sili.net/prob.php
http://mersenne-aries.sili.net/p1small.php
etc

Dubslow · 2012-06-12, 22:32

"Countdown to testing all exponents below M(42643801) once: 29"

Does that include or exclude suspect tests?

Uncwilly · 2012-06-12, 23:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

"Countdown to testing all exponents below M(42643801) once: 29"

Does that include or exclude suspect tests?

I believe that below means those less than. Also, M46 or M47 has already been tested 3 or 4 times.

Dubslow · 2012-06-13, 00:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

I believe that below means those less than. Also, M46 or M47 has already been tested 3 or 4 times.

??
What does that have to do with anything?

My question was, does that 29 include expos who have had a suspect test but no non-suspect test?

Uncwilly · 2012-06-13, 04:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

My question was, does that 29 include expos who have had a suspect test but no non-suspect test?

Ignore my post, I miss read your's. I was in a hurry to leave the domicile.

petrw1 · 2012-06-13, 05:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

"Countdown to testing all exponents below M(42643801) once: 29"

Does that include or exclude suspect tests?

My guess would be "exclude". I don't think suspect (or bad) tests count.

Brian-E · 2012-06-13, 09:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

My guess would be "exclude". I don't think suspect (or bad) tests count.

Yes, that's how I've always understood it too. Remembering, of course, that not all tests with a non-zero error code are considered suspect or bad.

c10ck3r · 2012-06-13, 15:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycorn

Yep. More precisely, 17,999, at 18:23 UTC.
But clearing them all will be a REALLY tough job (if ever undertaken...)

Accepted! "P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=10000000, B2=250000000, E=12.
UID: c10ck3r/mydell, M995791 has a factor: 8357700081329523357104974567"
92.7552 bits
k=3*11*1747*12739*232129*24615973
Running P-1 from 995k-1M at these bounds.

Uncwilly · 2012-06-19, 00:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

All exponents below 24,077,267 have been tested and double-checked.
All exponents below 38,103,407 have been tested at least once.

Countdown to testing all exponents below M(42643801) once: 39
Countdown to testing all exponents below M(43112609) once: 51

Countdown to proving M(25964951) is the 42nd Mersenne Prime: 498
Countdown to proving M(30402457) is the 43rd Mersenne Prime: 43,571

All exponents below 24,212,801 have been tested and double-checked.
All exponents below 38,195,891 have been tested at least once.

Countdown to testing all exponents below M(42643801) once: 28
Countdown to testing all exponents below M(43112609) once: 35

Countdown to proving M(25964951) is the 42nd Mersenne Prime: 185
Countdown to proving M(30402457) is the 43rd Mersenne Prime: 35,330

Dubslow · 2012-06-19, 04:44

Sigh... it's that same poacher...

PS George, since there's only 35 left total untested expos below known primes, would it be possible to program PrimeNet not to reassign them if/when they become available so that you can hand them out to chalsall, who might in turn pass them out to me/petrw1/bcp19/garo/flash etc. etc. for a quick finish? Any two of us could finish them in two months flat were they not already assigned.

(PPS That lowest 38M is supposed to be done in 5 days...)

2012-06-12, 22:32	#509
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 7221₁₀ Posts	Question... "Countdown to testing all exponents below M(42643801) once: 29" Does that include or exclude suspect tests?

2012-06-19, 04:44	#517
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3·29·83 Posts	Sigh... it's that same poacher... PS George, since there's only 35 left total untested expos below known primes, would it be possible to program PrimeNet not to reassign them if/when they become available so that you can hand them out to chalsall, who might in turn pass them out to me/petrw1/bcp19/garo/flash etc. etc. for a quick finish? Any two of us could finish them in two months flat were they not already assigned. (PPS That lowest 38M is supposed to be done in 5 days...) Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2012-06-19 at 04:49

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Newer X64 build needed	Googulator	Msieve	73	2020-08-30 07:47
Performance of cuda-ecm on newer hardware?	fivemack	GMP-ECM	14	2015-02-12 20:10
Cause this don't belong in the milestone thread	bcp19	Data	30	2012-09-08 15:09
Newer msieves are slow on Core i7	mklasson	Msieve	9	2009-02-18 12:58
Use of large memory pages possible with newer linux kernels	Dresdenboy	Software	3	2003-12-08 14:47

2012-06-12, 20:30	#507
c10ck3r Aug 2010 Kansas 547 Posts	I imagine below 10k will have "special attention" paid to it, leaving us with 990k for this project. Does anyone have a way to generate a pminus1= format worktodo.txt for exp<1M and B1<10M without all the hassle of manually typing it?