![]() |
|
|
#1882 | |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
3,313 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Exponent M54357769 is still being sporadic. No check-ins since a few days ago (May 25) so it's still at 99.4%. It'll expire in about 15-16 days. I'm still hopeful this person will sneak in just under the wire but it's definitely a squeaker already. Kind of amazing that it's taken this person 650 days so far to get up to 99.4%, and may or may not finish before it expires. Worst case, I'll check my result in just before expiration, and if they miss it by just a day or two, theirs will be a double-check. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1883 | |
|
Aug 2012
Mass., USA
1001111102 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1884 |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
3×5×313 Posts |
Countdown to testing all exponents below M(57885161) once: 459
Countdown to first time checking all exponents below 58M: 459 (Estimated completion : 2015-10-22) This suggests to me there are none between 57885161 and 58M? |
|
|
|
|
|
#1885 |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26×131 Posts |
I believe it would suggest that all potential candidates between the two of which there are 6378 at very most have been checked at least once. edit: when you consider p%4==3 and isprime(2*p+1), 229 get eliminated with a non trivial factor for example.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2015-06-04 at 16:27 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1886 |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
3,313 Posts |
That's correct, all exponents between 57,885,161 and 58M have already been checked at least once. (EDIT: or factored, as suggested)
Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2015-06-05 at 00:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1887 |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
331310 Posts |
I still have my fingers crossed. Weird to think this person will take nearly 660 days to finish this one test.
Here are my predictions on these final 4 under 57M: Code:
exponent Real Eta 54357769 2015-06-09 00:54 55027163 2015-07-18 07:53 55079077 2015-07-22 21:08 56931947 2015-06-13 13:57 That 56M exponent is a recent re-assignment when the original expired, so it'll have no problem finishing soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1888 | |
|
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.
17438 Posts |
Have you tested any of these 4 numbers?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1889 |
|
Aug 2012
Mass., USA
2·3·53 Posts |
M54357769 was finally finished by the person assigned to it after 654.8 days.
It's time for Madpoo to report his double-check of it. Madpoo has previously said he has done M54357769 without officially reporting the result, but I believe he denied working on the two in the 55M range. I think these two 55M have a decent chance of being finished by the assignee before expiring. Of course, there is every indication the fourth one will be finished soon by the current assignee. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1890 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
3·52·83 Posts |
The milestones report page is now out of date also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1891 |
|
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.
5·199 Posts |
So now all exponents bellow (or equal) to 55'000,000 have been tested at least once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1892 | |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
3,313 Posts |
Quote:
![]() I haven't tested those 55M exponents, but if it's getting closer to the wire on those and they're at risk of expiring anyway, I may run them and have the results standing by. I also just updated the milestones page with the June 6 date for everything under 55M. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Newer X64 build needed | Googulator | Msieve | 73 | 2020-08-30 07:47 |
| Performance of cuda-ecm on newer hardware? | fivemack | GMP-ECM | 14 | 2015-02-12 20:10 |
| Cause this don't belong in the milestone thread | bcp19 | Data | 30 | 2012-09-08 15:09 |
| Newer msieves are slow on Core i7 | mklasson | Msieve | 9 | 2009-02-18 12:58 |
| Use of large memory pages possible with newer linux kernels | Dresdenboy | Software | 3 | 2003-12-08 14:47 |