Thread for posting tiny primes - Page 28

3.14159 · 2010-09-05, 22:57

Hahaha, how cowardly of you.

Why not tell me directly, as opposed to mumbling about me like a common coward would?

Pack of sissies..

CRGreathouse · 2010-09-05, 23:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by kar_bon

And it's a ridiculous point of his list:

1. Wasting CPU-cycles to find the biggest prime proven by trial disivion.
2. He can't recognize simple 'easy' numbers.
3. He can't prove if such number is proven only by trial division.

I'm with you on all these counts. I raised the same objections to his proposal for using obsolete prime-proving tech (of which I suppose this is a special case).

Pi, we're doing this in the open, not by PM; there's no attempt to hide this from you.

science_man_88 · 2010-09-05, 23:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse

+1. If I had a nickel for every time he did that... well, I'd have about a buck. But still, that's a lot of rules changes.

how much would I owe lol. probably the same if not more.

3.14159 · 2010-09-06, 01:15

Even so: Why not directly tell me the supposed "objections", that you had?

CRGreathouse · 2010-09-06, 01:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.14159

Even so: Why not directly tell me the supposed "objections", that you had?

I've already given you objections, repeatedly, to your obsolete prime-proving category. Since this is just a particular form of it, I didn't feel the need. Further, I was responding to posts by sm and kar_bon, so of course I addressed my responses to them. Finally, there was no need to alert you to any of this because the posts were made on a public forum that you visit, on a thread where you are very active.

3.14159 · 2010-09-06, 14:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charles

I've already given you objections, repeatedly, to your obsolete prime-proving category.

It is entirely optional if one wishes to submit something for #20.

What poor scapegoating..

3.14159 · 2010-09-06, 15:25

Started a search for item 3; b = 600; n = 26; k = 1 to 10000. In other words; k * 600!²⁶ + 1.

3.14159 · 2010-09-06, 17:34

Each test takes about 80 seconds.. Nothing so far, but I'll get something sometime soon for that search. The odds should be excellent.

CRGreathouse · 2010-09-06, 21:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.14159

What poor scapegoating..

We must have different understandings of the word "scapegoat", because this sentence makes no sense in its context.

You asked for my objections and I explained them.

3.14159 · 2010-09-06, 22:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charles

We must have different understandings of the word "scapegoat", because this sentence makes no sense in its context.

You asked for my objections and I explained them.

And I refuted them. And you merely were reduced to blaming me. Scapegoating??!?!?!??

CRGreathouse · 2010-09-06, 23:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.14159

Scapegoating??!?!?!??

That's precisely what I said. What possible meaning could you have for that here?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.14159

And I refuted them.

You refuted none of them!

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3.14159

And you merely were reduced to blaming me.

At what point did I blame you? (I can't rule this out, but I don't recall doing it.)

2010-09-05, 22:57	#298
3.14159 May 2010 Prime hunting commission. 1680₁₀ Posts	Hahaha, how cowardly of you. Why not tell me directly, as opposed to mumbling about me like a common coward would? Pack of sissies.. Last fiddled with by 3.14159 on 2010-09-05 at 22:59

2010-09-06, 15:25	#304
3.14159 May 2010 Prime hunting commission. 2⁴·3·5·7 Posts	Started a search for item 3; b = 600; n = 26; k = 1 to 10000. In other words; k * 600!²⁶ + 1. Last fiddled with by 3.14159 on 2010-09-06 at 15:26

2010-09-06, 17:34	#305
3.14159 May 2010 Prime hunting commission. 2⁴·3·5·7 Posts	Each test takes about 80 seconds.. Nothing so far, but I'll get something sometime soon for that search. The odds should be excellent. Last fiddled with by 3.14159 on 2010-09-06 at 17:35

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Prime posting thread, part 2. (With a catch.)	3.14159	Miscellaneous Math	55	2010-11-19 23:55
Tiny range request .... 555.1M	petrw1	LMH > 100M	1	2010-07-13 15:35
Other primes thread	nuggetprime	No Prime Left Behind	32	2009-10-21 21:48
Error: tiny factoring failed	10metreh	Msieve	26	2009-03-08 23:28
Tiny error on nfsnet pages.	antiroach	NFSNET Discussion	1	2003-07-08 00:27

2010-09-06, 01:15	#301
3.14159 May 2010 Prime hunting commission. 2⁴·3·5·7 Posts	Even so: Why not directly tell me the supposed "objections", that you had?