PARI's commands

[science_man_88]

by the way CRG http://oeis.org/classic/A138576 are the sums of inside the parentheses for 2^1.

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by 3.14159

No! The sequence applies to all b!



Well, you stated that this happened to you as well, which makes me doubt that it happens to be only me.

And, it only fucks up when dealing with k * 308³⁰⁸ + 1. There have been no other errors before or afterwards. I'm going to test the original Primeform to make sure that this is just a minor problem.

this would be more appropriate.

[3.14159]

Tested the original Primeform, there seems to be no issue. Luckily, I missed no primes.

Originally Posted by science_man_88

this would be more appropriate.

Swearwords. Big deal. Everyone uses them.

[CRGreathouse]

Originally Posted by 3.14159

No! The sequence applies to all b!

So the sequence you're thinking of is the primes themselves?

Originally Posted by 3.14159

Well, you stated that this happened to you as well, which makes me doubt that it happens to be only me.

And, it only fucks up when dealing with k * 308³⁰⁸ + 1. There have been no other errors before or afterwards. I'm going to test the original Primeform to make sure that this is just a minor problem.

I tend to agree, but mdettweiler's advice is good -- better be sure.

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by 3.14159

Tested the original Primeform, there seems to be no issue. Luckily, I missed no primes.



Swearwords. Big deal. Everyone uses them.

I only remember using them around family the people that make me most mad most days.

[3.14159]

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse

So the sequence you're thinking of is the primes themselves?

Not at all. I was thinking of the k-values, 1 to 10000, for the b values, and the sequence would be the k-values for b = 60; Followed by k-values for b = 61, b = 62, b = 63, etc,

[CRGreathouse]

Originally Posted by 3.14159

Swearwords. Big deal. Everyone uses them.

I have to admit, the idea of an innocent child wading through eleven hundred pages of reasonably complicated math to learn a swear word is fairly amusing to me.

[CRGreathouse]

Originally Posted by 3.14159

Not at all. I was thinking of the k-values, 1 to 10000, for the b values, and the sequence would be the k-values for b = 60; Followed by k-values for b = 61, b = 62, b = 63, etc,

That seems pretty contrived, I don't know that you should submit that. Maybe the k-values by antidiagonals? But even so, the n >= 60 restriction seems unnatural.

[3.14159]

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse

I have to admit, the idea of an innocent child wading through eleven hundred pages of reasonably complicated math to learn a swear word is fairly amusing to me.

Would a kid even bother flipping through 1100 pages of math anyway?

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse

That seems pretty contrived, I don't know that you should submit that. Maybe the k-values by antidiagonals? But even so, the n >= 60 restriction seems unnatural.

So you suggest I use b = 2 as a starting point?

[CRGreathouse]

Originally Posted by 3.14159

Would a kid even bother flipping through 1100 pages of math anyway?

Would a kid read even one?

[3.14159]

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse

Would a kid read even one?

Only if it were basic arithmetic.