Operation Megabit Twin - Page 10

Oddball · 2010-07-12, 19:51

109T-111T complete:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/10q30d

I'll get 118T-120T and let amphoria or someone else fill up the 114T-118T gap. Once that gap and my range are done, phase 1 will be complete, and the 0-120T files will be sieved only for twins.

Flatlander · 2010-07-12, 21:03

Taking 114-118T.

amphoria · 2010-07-13, 16:26

111T-114T complete.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/6urjll

Taking 118T-120T.

mdettweiler · 2010-07-13, 16:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by amphoria

111T-114T complete.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/6urjll

Taking 118T-120T.

I believe Oddball already took that range earlier:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oddball

109T-111T complete:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/10q30d

I'll get 118T-120T and let amphoria or someone else fill up the 114T-118T gap. Once that gap and my range are done, phase 1 will be complete, and the 0-120T files will be sieved only for twins.

amphoria · 2010-07-13, 19:31

That's what happens when you have the forum set to display 100 messages per page.

In that case I will take 40T-60T for stage 2. It looks like the target for stage 2 is 45T based on my sieving of 0-20T. I am currently at 40.2T and am removing 0.3 sec per k with the very occasional increase to 0.4 sec per k. The target is based on 0.4 sec per k as that appears to be where there is no difference between fastarray mode and array mode on the processor I am doing the testing on. The idea, as first suggested by Oddball, is to merge all 6 files together once stage 2 is complete.

There are currently 13.49M k's remaining so the resulting file will probably contain 78-80M k's. However, the file size will be less than 2 GB NewPGen limit.

Oddball · 2010-07-14, 06:46

118T-120T complete:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/0cfpwh

Flatlander · 2010-07-14, 09:37

114-118T is complete.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/to5x6g

amphoria · 2010-07-14, 17:32

0-20T sieving is now complete to p=45T. There are 13.4M k's remaining.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/1p4vm5

Note this was sieved on a very fast computer that I don't normally use for sieving as I wanted to get a sieving target for stage 2. 40T-60T is being sieved on a laptop and is proceeding very slowly in comparison - but as Oddball stated at the start of this project there is no rush!

I see that gribozavr hasn't uploaded the stage 2 files yet, so I will upload the remaining ones from work tomorrow. My home internet connection is ADSL so the upload speed is not great.

amphoria · 2010-07-15, 07:29

Stage 2 files @ p=100B.

20T-40T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/uat1m5

40T-60T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/fasz0k

60T-80T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/xqyrij

80T-100T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/fd1u01

100T-120T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/9lf61o

I have uploaded 40T-60T even though I have reserved it so that I am not the only one holding the master files.

Flatlander · 2010-07-15, 10:31

60T-80T gives the error:

"Opened the input file - counting the number of k's and finding the range of k...
The numbers in the file are not strictly increasing : I saw 60000001535775 followed by -387009561795827639!"

So I'm taking 80T-100T, which is fine.

(100T-120T not checked.)

gribozavr · 2010-07-15, 11:07

Will we report factors by uploading new sieve files or by uploading factors themselves? Uploading factors is a bit safer, because at any point of time we can tell why was the number removed.

amphoria: I've compared you files to mine and they match, except for 60T-80T (it wasn't sorted and contained some junk lines). Here's a correct one:

60T-80T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/8loyk4

2010-07-13, 19:31	#104
amphoria "Dave" Sep 2005 UK 5330₈ Posts	That's what happens when you have the forum set to display 100 messages per page. In that case I will take 40T-60T for stage 2. It looks like the target for stage 2 is 45T based on my sieving of 0-20T. I am currently at 40.2T and am removing 0.3 sec per k with the very occasional increase to 0.4 sec per k. The target is based on 0.4 sec per k as that appears to be where there is no difference between fastarray mode and array mode on the processor I am doing the testing on. The idea, as first suggested by Oddball, is to merge all 6 files together once stage 2 is complete. There are currently 13.49M k's remaining so the resulting file will probably contain 78-80M k's. However, the file size will be less than 2 GB NewPGen limit. Last fiddled with by amphoria on 2010-07-13 at 19:55

2010-07-15, 10:31	#109
Flatlander I quite division it "Chris" Feb 2005 England 4035₈ Posts	60T-80T gives the error: "Opened the input file - counting the number of k's and finding the range of k... The numbers in the file are not strictly increasing : I saw 60000001535775 followed by -387009561795827639!" So I'm taking 80T-100T, which is fine. (100T-120T not checked.) Last fiddled with by Flatlander on 2010-07-15 at 10:34 Reason: clarification

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The Third Megabit Drive	pinhodecarlos	Riesel Prime Search	145	2023-01-20 11:23
Operation: Billion Digits	clowns789	Operation Billion Digits	575	2023-01-02 18:57
The Second Megabit Drive	Kosmaj	Riesel Prime Search	461	2022-04-10 09:08
modulo operation for polynomials?	smslca	Math	3	2011-04-18 17:18
The modulo operation, how is it computed?	eepiccolo	Math	7	2003-01-08 03:07

2010-07-12, 19:51	#100
Oddball May 2010 499 Posts	109T-111T complete: http://www.sendspace.com/file/10q30d I'll get 118T-120T and let amphoria or someone else fill up the 114T-118T gap. Once that gap and my range are done, phase 1 will be complete, and the 0-120T files will be sieved only for twins.

2010-07-12, 21:03	#101
Flatlander I quite division it "Chris" Feb 2005 England 81D₁₆ Posts	Taking 114-118T.

2010-07-13, 16:26	#102
amphoria "Dave" Sep 2005 UK 2³×347 Posts	111T-114T complete. http://www.sendspace.com/file/6urjll Taking 118T-120T.

2010-07-14, 06:46	#105
Oddball May 2010 499 Posts	118T-120T complete: http://www.sendspace.com/file/0cfpwh

2010-07-14, 09:37	#106
Flatlander I quite division it "Chris" Feb 2005 England 81D₁₆ Posts	114-118T is complete. http://www.sendspace.com/file/to5x6g

2010-07-14, 17:32	#107
amphoria "Dave" Sep 2005 UK 2³×347 Posts	0-20T sieving is now complete to p=45T. There are 13.4M k's remaining. http://www.sendspace.com/file/1p4vm5 Note this was sieved on a very fast computer that I don't normally use for sieving as I wanted to get a sieving target for stage 2. 40T-60T is being sieved on a laptop and is proceeding very slowly in comparison - but as Oddball stated at the start of this project there is no rush! I see that gribozavr hasn't uploaded the stage 2 files yet, so I will upload the remaining ones from work tomorrow. My home internet connection is ADSL so the upload speed is not great.

2010-07-15, 07:29	#108
amphoria "Dave" Sep 2005 UK 2³×347 Posts	Stage 2 files @ p=100B. 20T-40T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/uat1m5 40T-60T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/fasz0k 60T-80T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/xqyrij 80T-100T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/fd1u01 100T-120T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/9lf61o I have uploaded 40T-60T even though I have reserved it so that I am not the only one holding the master files.

2010-07-15, 11:07	#110
gribozavr Mar 2005 Internet; Ukraine, Kiev 11·37 Posts	Will we report factors by uploading new sieve files or by uploading factors themselves? Uploading factors is a bit safer, because at any point of time we can tell why was the number removed. amphoria: I've compared you files to mine and they match, except for 60T-80T (it wasn't sorted and contained some junk lines). Here's a correct one: 60T-80T: http://www.sendspace.com/file/8loyk4