![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2002
2×331 Posts |
I read the news at nfsnet.org mentioning that 2^811 could take as long as year.
http://www.nfsnet.org/status.html I did some calculations, using the current rate of production the sieving would finish in July 2004. There are roughly 70 machines ( 35 users ) active each day. If you aren't currently working on nfsnet, consider joining in. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
21018 Posts |
Thanks for encouraging others to join. We NEED a lot more help.
First the good news. Paul has his cluster busy on the post-processing of M757 and other things. We should be able to get some time from it before we finish this sieving for M811. But for the bad news. I'm not sure what method you used to make your estimate. If you are extrapolating relations per day, you must recognize that we are presently sieving at relatively low line numbers. The number of relations per line will drop as we get further into the work, but the effort will remain the same. I seriously doubt that we will meet your projection unless there is a massive increase in participation. But we WILL get there........ eventually. Richard |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sep 2002
29616 Posts |
I didn't realize that the number of relations per line sieved would vary substantially, it is about 2.25 relations per line now, so could it get as low as 1 for 1 or even lower ?
If it requires alot of work to figure it out please don't spend your time on it. I hope more people will join in. At least having this spot in the mersenneforum gives very good exposure. Thanks to all who make it possible. I would never have known about it otherwise. Dan |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
32×112 Posts |
2.25 is the number that I hae for lines around 4M. The MSRC server jumped back to fill in 2M and is getting about 3.4 there.
Up at 10M, the LoneStar folks are getting about 1.63. Above 50M, I don't have good numbers yet, but I am estimating that we will be below 0.75. Depending on how things fill in, we may have to go even higher and get only 0.65. As we go along, I'll be able to improve my estimates. But, in any case, it's a lot of sieving. Bring your friends. There is plenty of work to spread around. Richard |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Jan 2004
100001012 Posts |
hi, im new into that forum. Im running distributed contest for a couple of years now (RC5-64, SETI@home, ECCp-109, ECC2-109 (in progress) and im testing NSF now :)
i dont know if ya were expecting these numbers: but we have: 40.69% complete (32553.3 of 80000 workunits) later |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Jan 2004
13310 Posts |
hhehe, now the % is over 85%, pretty cool and we're still in February.
and for today, we reached a new record of lines ( http://www.nfsnet.org/stats2/statsre...gesize=&page=0 ) . so its really cool. btw, i've a question for Richard, ya said: "2.25 is the number that I hae for lines around 4M. The MSRC server jumped back to fill in 2M and is getting about 3.4 there. Up at 10M, the LoneStar folks are getting about 1.63." whats the MSRC server and LoneStar is the name of a pool right ? thanks. Last fiddled with by junky on 2004-02-27 at 01:07 |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Sep 2002
2×331 Posts |
MSRC = Microsoft Research Cambridge
Lonestar is the Texas server run/maintained by Wacky ( Richard ). |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jan 2004
7×19 Posts |
Thanks for clarification :)
can i know who's is maintening the Fenland, and Longhorn server ? |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Jul 2003
So Cal
2·34·13 Posts |
Quote:
Greg |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Sep 2002
2×331 Posts |
Longhorn is the new name for Lonestar, so it is maintained by Richard.
As for Fenland, I don't know for sure, but Fenland is near Cambridge so it probably is Paul. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Jan 2004
2058 Posts |
thanks dan, sorry greg
hhehee |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How many ecm curves per B1 is a good estimate? | EdH | Factoring | 45 | 2013-10-23 13:39 |
| Benchmark Estimate | Primeinator | Information & Answers | 8 | 2009-06-11 23:39 |
| V25.7 TF estimate way out ... or am I? | petrw1 | PrimeNet | 5 | 2008-11-08 02:23 |
| Estimate the new primes | davieddy | Lounge | 34 | 2008-09-17 04:22 |
| A tricky way to estimate pi(x) | XYYXF | Math | 13 | 2006-09-01 15:44 |