Recommended bases and efforts - Page 11

gd_barnes · 2017-05-05, 19:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterBitcoin

You can remove R877, srbsieve just passed n=7,6K.

I will remove it when it is done. Also it is recommended to n=25K. You are only taking it to n=10K. For these smaller conjectured bases that only take a few days to test to n=10K, may I suggest testing them to n=25K instead?

MisterBitcoin · 2017-05-05, 19:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

I will remove it when it is done. Also it is recommended to n=25K. You are only taking it to n=10K. For these smaller conjectured bases that only take a few days to test to n=10K, may I suggest testing them to n=25K instead?

I´ll test up to n=10K with srbsieve, higher values will be tested with LLR which is faster.

gd_barnes · 2017-05-05, 19:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterBitcoin

I´ll test up to n=10K with srbsieve, higher values will be tested with LLR which is faster.

I'm a little confused. So are you reserving R877 to n=25K? Will you be reserving S646 to n=25K? If so, those can be done in one reservation where you report the status at n=10K and then again when finished.

MisterBitcoin · 2017-05-05, 20:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

I'm a little confused. So are you reserving R877 to n=25K? Will you be reserving S646 to n=25K? If so, those can be done in one reservation where you report the status at n=10K and then again when finished.

My plan is to finish R877 to n=10K and release it, than I´ll take S646.
In the same time doing S646 I will do the remaining sieve files for the recommended 10-25K bases.

gd_barnes · 2017-05-05, 20:03

Great thanks. I'll go ahead and reserve S646 to n=25K for you.

gd_barnes · 2017-08-24, 22:11

I have added a few more recommended for misc. testing and for BOINC.

gd_barnes · 2017-10-19, 08:37

I have added 11 new bases to the list that have 1, 2, 3, or 4 k's remaining. Only one of the bases have been sieved so they are also a sieving recommendation. All have a "difficulty" value of < 10000 as shown here:
http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/cru...s-unproven.htm

This means that the bases should, relatively speaking, be faster to test than most bases and many should be able to be proven over the next few months and years. That is...they are somewhat "behind" where they should be tested.

The bases with low difficulty values are a good way to come up work that gives us the most bang for our buck.

gd_barnes · 2018-01-07, 06:59

1k bases R398 and R662 for n=200K-500K recommended for BOINC. R662 now has a fully sieved file. I'm working on sieving R398. These are the two lowest difficulty bases remaining on the Riesel side.

I also added S212 for k=6 only that has a fully sieved file. The other 3 k's on this base have been searched to n=500K. k=6 has only been searched to n=200K and so needs to be caught up.

gd_barnes · 2018-01-15, 01:43

Added R615 and R643 for BOINC. 2k and 3k bases to n=250K. R615 has a sieve file. I'll start working on a file for R643 later this week.

gd_barnes · 2018-02-11, 05:12

Added R411, R495, and R675 n=25K-100K for BOINC. R675 sieving just completed. R411 and R495 sieving is in progress. MisterBitcoin is working on R411 and I am working on R495.

Also added a new designation in the first post. "s" means that sieving is in progress.

gd_barnes · 2018-02-16, 17:45

I added a few more n=25K-100K bases. We are gradually getting some of them sieved.

R495 is ready to go.

2018-01-07, 06:59	#118
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101×103 Posts	1k bases R398 and R662 for n=200K-500K recommended for BOINC. R662 now has a fully sieved file. I'm working on sieving R398. These are the two lowest difficulty bases remaining on the Riesel side. I also added S212 for k=6 only that has a fully sieved file. The other 3 k's on this base have been searched to n=500K. k=6 has only been searched to n=200K and so needs to be caught up. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2018-01-07 at 07:53

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Cunningham ECM efforts	pinhodecarlos	Cunningham Tables	7	2017-12-21 13:29
Doublecheck efforts; S66/S79 to start with	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	16	2014-08-07 02:11
ECM efforts mistake?	10metreh	mersennewiki	1	2008-12-28 13:31
Recommended TF bit levels for M(>10^8)	NBtarheel_33	Math	19	2008-11-03 17:19
ECM Efforts	R.D. Silverman	Factoring	63	2005-06-24 13:41

2017-05-05, 20:03	#115
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101×103 Posts	Great thanks. I'll go ahead and reserve S646 to n=25K for you.

2017-08-24, 22:11	#116
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101×103 Posts	I have added a few more recommended for misc. testing and for BOINC.

2017-10-19, 08:37	#117
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 10100010100011₂ Posts	I have added 11 new bases to the list that have 1, 2, 3, or 4 k's remaining. Only one of the bases have been sieved so they are also a sieving recommendation. All have a "difficulty" value of < 10000 as shown here: http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/cru...s-unproven.htm This means that the bases should, relatively speaking, be faster to test than most bases and many should be able to be proven over the next few months and years. That is...they are somewhat "behind" where they should be tested. The bases with low difficulty values are a good way to come up work that gives us the most bang for our buck.

2018-01-15, 01:43	#119
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101·103 Posts	Added R615 and R643 for BOINC. 2k and 3k bases to n=250K. R615 has a sieve file. I'll start working on a file for R643 later this week.

2018-02-11, 05:12	#120
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101×103 Posts	Added R411, R495, and R675 n=25K-100K for BOINC. R675 sieving just completed. R411 and R495 sieving is in progress. MisterBitcoin is working on R411 and I am working on R495. Also added a new designation in the first post. "s" means that sieving is in progress.

2018-02-16, 17:45	#121
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 24243₈ Posts	I added a few more n=25K-100K bases. We are gradually getting some of them sieved. R495 is ready to go.