![]() |
|
|
#639 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
I presume you have met Paul by now.
I haven't, but as you will understand, this would be superfluous. Will check out that Tom Lehrer ditty in due course. Visited the Flask the other day. Met a really nice bloke from Norfolk. OTOH met that same bloke I told you about - opening line "I'm going to knock your ******* head off". Happy Days, David |
|
|
|
|
|
#640 | |
|
Jan 2010
379 Posts |
Quote:
It is really hard to prove what I don't know. Is my formula on #636 right? My problem here is how not to use the result of the second problem. Showing the coefficients of g(x) as a function of the coefficients of f(x) include understanding the coefficients of f(x). The common sense we can find between those coefficients (of f and g) is the roots which with those we can show the coefficients (by the result of the second problem), I can't see another way to find the coefficients as a function of the roots. Last fiddled with by blob100 on 2010-06-21 at 08:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#641 | |
|
Jan 2010
379 Posts |
Quote:
f(x)=(x-x1)(x-x2)...(x-xn) g(x)=(x-X1)(x-X2)...(x-Xn) Where Xi (given root of g(x))=xi^(-1) (the inverse of f(x)'s root). Let R={x1,x2,...,xn}, M={X1,X2,...,Xn}={1/x1,1/x2,...,1/xn}. a_i=F(R) a function of the roots of f(x) (this function is what problem 2 relate to (the result)). b_i=F(M) a function of the roots of g(x). a_i and b_i are the coefficients of x^i in f(x) and g(x) order wise. To show b_i as a function of a_i, we must understand the function F. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#642 | |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#643 |
|
Jan 2010
379 Posts |
Is this the direction?:
f(x1)=0 g(1/x1)=0. f(x1)=g(1/x1)=0. It does not seem easy to find the coefficients of g(x) as a function of the ones of f(x) by this equation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#644 |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#645 |
|
Jan 2010
379 Posts |
But hard. To do it?
Last fiddled with by blob100 on 2010-06-21 at 14:53 |
|
|
|
|
|
#646 |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#647 |
|
Jan 2010
379 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#648 |
|
Nov 2003
1D2416 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#649 |
|
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
32·112 Posts |
Perhaps you can use a more direct hint:
Given f(X) = AnXn + An-1Xn-1 + ... + A1X + A0 with roots a1, a2, ..., an and g(Y) = BnYn + Bn-1Yn-1 + ... + B1Y + B0 with roots b1, b2, ..., bn where, for i in 1 ... n, bi = 1/ai You need to express Bj in terms of the Ai. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some ideas regarding NFS... | paul0 | Factoring | 3 | 2015-03-14 19:55 |
| Ideas for the future beyond just-keep-encrunching | Dubslow | NFS@Home | 13 | 2015-02-02 22:25 |
| two ideas for NPLB | Mini-Geek | No Prime Left Behind | 16 | 2008-03-01 23:32 |
| GROUP IDEAS | TTn | 15k Search | 15 | 2003-09-23 16:28 |
| Domain name ideas... | Xyzzy | Lounge | 17 | 2003-03-24 16:20 |