mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-06-17, 23:06   #617
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wblipp View Post
Bob,

I'm pretty sure you intend for polynomials to always have integer coefficients and that Tomer doesn't know this.
Huh? I wrote originally:
"Suppose that its roots are x_0, x_1, .... x_n.
a_i are integers."

This doesn't leave much room for doubt that the coefficients are
integers.
Quote:

I also think he may benefit from some guidance about how substitution of variables works.
He claims to be ready for calculus and other university level
courses. If he needs help with first year algebra (i.e. use of variables as
you suggest) then it is clear that he is nowhere near ready.

I have repeatedly told him that he introduces too many 'free variables'
in his problems; often without defining them. He doesn't seem to get
that message.

To be fair to both of us: this all would be better in front of a blackboard.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-17, 23:13   #618
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
No. For any polynomial f(x) of arbitrary degree k, and any polynomial q(x)
of degree r < k, we can write

f(x) = q(x) * g(x) + r(x) where g(x) is a polynomial of degree
r-k and r(x) has degree less than q(x).
Ooops! Clearly r-k should be k-r.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 07:33   #619
blob100
 
Jan 2010

379 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Huh? I wrote originally:
"Suppose that its roots are x_0, x_1, .... x_n.
a_i are integers."

This doesn't leave much room for doubt that the coefficients are
integers.
.
I know f(x)'s coefficients are integers.
But what about g(x)'s coefficients? are these integers too?
g(x) is defined as a polynomial with roots x_0^-1, x_1^-1, .... x_n^-1.
blob100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 07:49   #620
blob100
 
Jan 2010

1011110112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
No. For any polynomial f(x) of arbitrary degree k, and any polynomial q(x)
of degree r < k, we can write

f(x) = q(x) * g(x) + r(x) where g(x) is a polynomial of degree
r-k and r(x) has degree less than q(x).

In words: we can divide any polynomial by any other polynomial of
lesser degree leaving a polynomial remainder of even lesser degree than
the divisor.

It is not specific to division by just linear polynomials and has nothing to
do with the roots of the polynomial.

It is analagous to the division algorithm for integers. Any integer N in Z+
can be written as N = d*q + r where r < d and d is the divisor.
The same applies for polynomials.

Do you know how to prove this?
In wolfram alpha it is called a polynomial remainder.
blob100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 07:54   #621
blob100
 
Jan 2010

379 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
No. For any polynomial f(x) of arbitrary degree k, and any polynomial q(x)
of degree r < k, we can write

f(x) = q(x) * g(x) + r(x) where g(x) is a polynomial of degree
r-k and r(x) has degree less than q(x).

In words: we can divide any polynomial by any other polynomial of
lesser degree leaving a polynomial remainder of even lesser degree than
the divisor.

It is not specific to division by just linear polynomials and has nothing to
do with the roots of the polynomial.

It is analagous to the division algorithm for integers. Any integer N in Z+
can be written as N = d*q + r where r < d and d is the divisor.
The same applies for polynomials.

Do you know how to prove this?
I think you are able to find infinitely many synthetic devisions for a given polynomial.
blob100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 10:09   #622
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blob100 View Post
I know f(x)'s coefficients are integers.
But what about g(x)'s coefficients? are these integers too?
g(x) is defined as a polynomial with roots x_0^-1, x_1^-1, .... x_n^-1.
Yes, they are integers. Try expressing them in terms of the coefficients of f.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 10:11   #623
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blob100 View Post
I think you are able to find infinitely many synthetic devisions for a given polynomial.

Synthetic division involves TWO given polynomials, not 'a given polynomial'.
The divisor polynomial is also given.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 11:22   #624
blob100
 
Jan 2010

379 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Synthetic division involves TWO given polynomials, not 'a given polynomial'.
The divisor polynomial is also given.
OK.
blob100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 11:42   #625
wblipp
 
wblipp's Avatar
 
"William"
May 2003
New Haven

2×7×132 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
No. For any polynomial f(x) of arbitrary degree k, and any polynomial q(x)
of degree r < k, we can write

f(x) = q(x) * g(x) + r(x) where g(x) is a polynomial of degree
r-k and r(x) has degree less than q(x).

In words: we can divide any polynomial by any other polynomial of
lesser degree leaving a polynomial remainder of even lesser degree than
the divisor.

It is not specific to division by just linear polynomials and has nothing to
do with the roots of the polynomial.

It is analagous to the division algorithm for integers. Any integer N in Z+
can be written as N = d*q + r where r < d and d is the divisor.
The same applies for polynomials.

Do you know how to prove this?

Bob,

I think the process you have described is usually called polynomial division. I think "synthetic division" is usually used for the special problem of checking for divisibility by a linear factor by evaluating the polynomial at the root of the linear polynomial. That usage of "synthetic division" does have something do with the roots of the polynomial.

Also, I can't tell if the final "this" refers to the result for integers or the result for polynomials.

William
wblipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 14:02   #626
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wblipp View Post
Bob,

I think the process you have described is usually called polynomial division. I think "synthetic division" is usually used for the special problem of checking for divisibility by a linear factor by evaluating the polynomial at the root of the linear polynomial. That usage of "synthetic division" does have something do with the roots of the polynomial.

Also, I can't tell if the final "this" refers to the result for integers or the result for polynomials.

William
'This' refers to the result for polynomials. We had already proved the
result for integers in an earlier post.

The Wikipaedia says of synthetic division:

"It is mostly taught for division by binomials of the form
but the method generalizes to division by any monic polynomial. "

I think the words "mostly" and "generalizes" are relevant.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-06-18, 14:30   #627
wblipp
 
wblipp's Avatar
 
"William"
May 2003
New Haven

2×7×132 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
"It is mostly taught for division by binomials of the form but the method generalizes to division by any monic polynomial."
Hmm. The thing Wikipedia calls synthetic division is VASTLY different from the thing I was taught as synthetic division. I was taught the thing at the first Google link,

http://www.purplemath.com/modules/synthdiv.htm

which says

"Synthetic division is a shorthand, or shortcut, method of polynomial division in the special case of dividing by a linear factor -- and it only works in this case."

I guess there must be multiple definitions of synthetic division.

Last fiddled with by wblipp on 2010-06-18 at 14:30
wblipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some ideas regarding NFS... paul0 Factoring 3 2015-03-14 19:55
Ideas for the future beyond just-keep-encrunching Dubslow NFS@Home 13 2015-02-02 22:25
two ideas for NPLB Mini-Geek No Prime Left Behind 16 2008-03-01 23:32
GROUP IDEAS TTn 15k Search 15 2003-09-23 16:28
Domain name ideas... Xyzzy Lounge 17 2003-03-24 16:20

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:21.


Fri Aug 6 08:21:16 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 2:50, 1 user, load averages: 2.18, 2.31, 2.29

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.