![]() |
|
|
#397 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
B2416 Posts |
Riesel Base 904
Conjectured k = 1266 Covering Set = 5, 181 Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 3(3) and k == 1 mod 7(7) and k == 1 mod 43(43) Found Primes: 687k's - File attached Remaining k's: 15k's - File attached - Tested to n=25K k=9, 144, 324, 729, & 1089 proven composite by partial algebraic factors Trivial Factor Eliminations: 557 k's Base Released Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
#398 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
B2416 Posts |
Reserving Riesel 954 and 1009 as new to n=25K
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2·41·127 Posts |
S863, S881, and S902 k=8 conjectures are proven and added to the pages.
With Mark's latest round of them on the Riesel side, this now completes all proven k=8 conjectures on both sides. I have 5 others on the Sierp side that have one k remaining at n=25K. I'll post those over the next few days. |
|
|
|
|
|
#400 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
22×7×227 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Isn't that annoying that so many of these small conjectures have a single k remaining at n=25000? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#401 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2·41·127 Posts |
Quote:
![]() As for 1 k remaining, although annoying, it's definitely expected especially for bases > ~250. I'd be surprised otherwise. I don't know what others do but in this case, I searched 10 bases at once by n-value for n=5K-25K. I was fairly lucky to find a final prime on 5 of them since they were all b>300. 5 ended up with 1 k remaining. It is a pain to have to sieve them all separately but searching them all at once sure saves a lot of human time. It involves a bit of manual manipulation to get it into the proper PFGW formatted sieve file after sieving all of the bases. Srfile can't bring together multiple bases into one PFGW-formatted sieve file. I personally like searching them all at once upwards by n-value since that finds a prime the most quickly for most of them. One hint if you search several bases at once, be very careful with the stop-on-prime option. Since many of the k=8 conjectures had k=4 remaining, you certainly wouldn't want to stop-on-prime for k=4. But in this case, since they all had only 1 k remaining, I was able to have it stop when a prime was found for the BASE. Note that that wouldn't work if you had more than one k in some of the bases since you'd miss searching the remaining n's for the k('s) without a prime, but it does work well for a bunch of 1 k remaining bases. PFGW isn't sophisticated enough to be able to differentiate k=4 on one base from k=4 on a different base within the same search. Mark, can PRPnet handle searching multiple bases at once? If so, can it stop on prime for a specific k / base combo instead of just stopping when a specific k -OR- a specific base finds a prime? That would be very cool. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-04-13 at 00:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#402 | ||
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
22×7×227 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
There is no way to stop searching if a prime is found for a base (regardless of k and c). Is this is need? If so, I would like to understand it further. If I didn't know any better, I suspect that you would want this for a GFN type search. PRPNet supports such a search, but does not stop if a prime is found for one of the bases. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#403 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101011102 Posts |
Quote:
On the other topic, please don't "finish up" a group of something several days in a row. (lol, it wouldn't be finishing up a group of something then) If you really are finishing up a group of something, then that's fine. Weekends are very busy in my personal/business life but I have plenty of time for the projects on Monday and Tuesday; the opposite of most people. As an example, I skipped late Fri, all Sat, and most of Sun. updating the pages. I then updated them very late Sun./early Mon. There were already 10-12 new bases plus 3 more that I did. I had to follow up on 2 of them and there was one that was involved with 2 different kinds of algebraic factors. Now there's the added task of running srsieve whenever there is 1 k remaining. If you guys wanna help me out a little, whenever you post a status on a new base with 1 k remaining, please run srsieve to P=511 for n=100001 to 110000 and let me know how many candidates are remaining. That will be the weight shown in the 1k thread. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-04-13 at 09:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#404 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
1011001001002 Posts |
Reserving Sierp 939 and Riesel 789 as new to n=25K
Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2010-04-13 at 11:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
#405 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
22·7·227 Posts |
Primes found:
2*935^72-1 4*935^1-1 6*935^3-1 8*935^2-1 10*935^1-1 12*935^2-1 2*983^200-1 4*983^1-1 6*983^1-1 8*983^2-1 10*983^1-1 12*983^12-1 With a conjectured k of 14, both of these are proven. |
|
|
|
|
|
#406 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
18D416 Posts |
I have completed this to n=100000 and am releasing it. No primes found. The residues are attached.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#407 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Sierp Base 939
Conjectured k = 46 Covering Set = 5, 47 Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2) and k == 6 mod 7(7) and k == 66 mod 67(67) Found Primes: 18k's - File attached Remaining k's: 1k - Tested to n=25K 30*939^n+1 Trivial Factor Eliminations: 3k's k weight = 1855 Base Released Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:15 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1694 | 2021-08-06 20:41 |
| Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1398 | 2021-08-06 12:49 |
| Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1108 | 2021-08-04 18:49 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2305 | 2021-08-04 15:09 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 908 | 2021-08-01 07:48 |