![]() |
|
|
#331 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Reserving Riesel 870 and 922 as new to n=25K
|
|
|
|
|
|
#332 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
18D416 Posts |
Primes found:
2*593^4-1 4*593^1-1 6*593^1-1 8*593^2-1 The other k have trivial factors. With a conjectured k of 10, this conjecture is proven. |
|
|
|
|
|
#333 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
22·7·227 Posts |
This base has been tested to n=25000.
Primes found: 2*566^4-1 3*566^1-1 4*566^23873-1 5*566^2-1 k=1 and k=6 have trivial factors. k=7 remains. This base is released. I was pleasantly surprised that k=4 has a prime because I was wondering if I missed an algebraic factorization. Yes Gary, I know that I have submitted three results today and have one reservation. Fortunately none of these bases have any algebraic factorizations for you to worry about. I won't be posting any results tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#334 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
133778 Posts |
reserving riesel 752
there are 13 ks remaining at n=2500 which i think is high for a conjecture of ~100 |
|
|
|
|
|
#335 |
|
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
2,593 Posts |
Riesel base 800, k=88
Primes n>10000: 53*800^14346-1 23*800^20452-1 5*800^20508-1 Remaining k's: 4*800^n-1 8*800^n-1 25*800^n-1 Are there any algebraic factorizations? |
|
|
|
|
|
#336 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
251916 Posts |
Some for each of them, but no 'deadly' eliminations, just flesh wounds.
n=0|2: square for 4*800^n-1 0|3 2^3 8*800^n-1 1|2 80^2 8*800^n-1 0|2 5^2 25*800^n-1 4|5 50^5 25*800^n-1 So, 4*800^n-1: odd n are alive and still need work, 8*800^n-1: n=2,4(mod 6) survive and need work, 25*800^n-1: n=1,3,5,7(mod 10) survive and need work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#337 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
22×7×227 Posts |
Primes found:
Code:
489*928^11587-1 662*928^12427-1 885*928^10067-1 1367*928^10874-1 1521*928^11273-1 1728*928^12796-1 1851*928^11633-1 2286*928^14583-1 2522*928^10962-1 3908*928^11388-1 4005*928^13723-1 4293*928^14817-1 4458*928^12192-1 4983*928^10496-1 5342*928^10223-1 5364*928^10032-1 5979*928^10727-1 6038*928^13038-1 6122*928^11268-1 6143*928^11661-1 6516*928^11211-1 6563*928^12498-1 6818*928^10874-1 6972*928^11015-1 7914*928^11256-1 8006*928^13073-1 8171*928^10299-1 8750*928^12347-1 8858*928^11898-1 8948*928^13820-1 9647*928^14815-1 10887*928^12588-1 11903*928^10068-1 12026*928^10735-1 12149*928^11956-1 12189*928^10587-1 12561*928^11847-1 12942*928^12763-1 12978*928^13256-1 13080*928^14344-1 13116*928^10195-1 13154*928^11209-1 13274*928^12335-1 13517*928^11186-1 13572*928^12364-1 13997*928^11407-1 14001*928^12866-1 14897*928^12352-1 15149*928^11228-1 15248*928^12801-1 15353*928^10844-1 15689*928^10304-1 16107*928^10095-1 16397*928^13428-1 16692*928^10771-1 17193*928^14120-1 17420*928^12570-1 17616*928^13117-1 17802*928^10796-1 17991*928^12199-1 19175*928^10668-1 19202*928^12151-1 19853*928^13856-1 20253*928^11465-1 20282*928^13175-1 20793*928^12220-1 20936*928^11913-1 22227*928^10140-1 22790*928^11385-1 23081*928^14553-1 23193*928^12081-1 23501*928^11139-1 23552*928^10218-1 23697*928^13875-1 24060*928^10010-1 24645*928^10535-1 25841*928^12921-1 26055*928^11830-1 26991*928^10222-1 27341*928^13494-1 27567*928^10916-1 27666*928^10446-1 27908*928^14436-1 28257*928^14390-1 29153*928^11120-1 29421*928^11517-1 30471*928^14643-1 30501*928^12338-1 30831*928^13810-1 31292*928^11183-1 31439*928^10352-1 31458*928^11013-1 31739*928^12856-1 32022*928^14983-1 32288*928^12034-1 Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-04-06 at 04:57 Reason: sort primes correctly |
|
|
|
|
|
#338 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32×13×89 Posts |
Quote:
Is your search limit n=25K on this? I assume you are releasing the base. Is that correct? Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-04-05 at 06:22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#339 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
Serge just reported in an Email that he is working on S736 and has only 1 k remaining, possibly searched to n=50K.
Serge, I'll just show the base as reserved by you for now and will await more details before showing anything else. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#340 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
9,497 Posts |
Here's the bottom of the file:
Special modular reduction using all-complex FFT length 48K on 12*736^49762+1 12*736^49762+1 is composite: RES64: [AC939B6DF751B4C0] (486.2651s+0.0077s) Special modular reduction using all-complex FFT length 48K on 12*736^49838+1 12*736^49838+1 is composite: RES64: [9B89781FA2896439] (486.2233s+0.0078s) Special modular reduction using all-complex FFT length 48K on 12*736^49878+1 12*736^49878+1 is composite: RES64: [413237B012FC9095] (487.6378s+0.0077s) Special modular reduction using all-complex FFT length 48K on 12*736^49930+1 12*736^49930+1 is composite: RES64: [4932E6E3709B79DD] (488.2011s+0.0080s) Special modular reduction using all-complex FFT length 48K on 12*736^49942+1 12*736^49942+1 is composite: RES64: [D67226A6C349F805] (487.2219s+0.0077s) I'll send you the complete set by email. Only k=12 remains at 50K and the base is released (I have too many reserved; I will try to round them up.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#341 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101011012 Posts |
OK, I got it. For public reference, here are the statuses reported in the Email:
S736 is complete to n=50K; only k=12 remaining; base released. R931 is complete to n=30K; 4 k's remaining; base released. With a CK of 3960, R931 is yet another remarkably heavy-weight b==(1 mod 30) base. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-04-05 at 08:05 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1694 | 2021-08-06 20:41 |
| Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1398 | 2021-08-06 12:49 |
| Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1108 | 2021-08-04 18:49 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2305 | 2021-08-04 15:09 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 908 | 2021-08-01 07:48 |