![]() |
|
|
#133 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
Riesel Base 834
Conjectured k = 166 Covering Set = 5, 167 Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 7(7) and k == 1 mod 11(11) Found Primes: 129k's File attached Remaining k's: 4*834^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors 9*834^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors 49*834^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors 144*834^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors Trivial Factor Eliminations: 31k's Conjecture Proven Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
B2416 Posts |
Riesel Base 849
Conjectured k = 16 Covering Set = 5, 17 Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2) and k == 1 mod 53(53) Found Primes: 2*849^1-1 6*849^19-1 8*849^1-1 10*849^21-1 12*849^2-1 14*849^4114-1 Remaining k's: 4*849^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors Conjecture Proven |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Riesel Base 859
Conjectured k = 44 Covering Set = 5, 43 Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2) and k == 1 mod 3(3) and k == 1 mod 11(11) and k == 1 mod 13(13) Found Primes: 11k's File attached Remaining k's: 26*859^n-1 Trivial Factor Eliminations: 9k's Base Released Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
Riesel Base 879
Conjectured k = 34 Covering Set = 5, 11 Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2) and k == 1 mod 439(439) Found Primes: 14k's File attached Remaining k's: Tested to n=25K 4*879^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors 24*879^n-1 Base Released Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
Reserving Riesel Bases 939, 949, 964, 969, 984
This is the last of b = 4 mod 5 algebraic factors that I have done |
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101×103 Posts |
Batalov sent me full results file on all of his bases. Here is some additional detail to add to his Sierp base 961 status in the Email that I posted above:
R1021 is at n=50K; released S1002 is at n=27.7K; released Here is the additional base 961 prime that had not yet been posted in the forum: 346*961^30374+1 is prime He no longer has any bases > 500 reserved. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-01-24 at 03:48 |
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242438 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101000112 Posts |
Quote:
![]() ![]() And here's the kicker: I bet you can't test it to n=1 in an hour, even if you put all of your machines on it at the same time. For speed, be sure and set no factoring with the -f0 switch. You can even forget about proving the PRPs. (I'm not sure if running at least 2 regular ABC2 PFGW scripts would be faster [one each for k==(0 mod 6) & (2 mod 6)]. Likely not since there's so many other trivial k's.) Better yet, I'll give you a day with all of your machines and you still don't have to prove the PRPs. Just divide the k-value by 50 or whatever # of cores you have and split them up that way just like you'd do different P-ranges while sieveing. Good luck! ![]() Edit: I got to k=1M in just a few mins. of course that's < 1 one-millionth of the entire k-range. :-) Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-01-24 at 12:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
I wonder what would be the fastest way to go about doing something like that...my initial impression would be that sieving might be a good thing to do, since the numbers are so plentiful that anything where you look at them one at a time would be terribly slow, and so small that they might be easily TFd (or proven prime by TF).
I doubt any current sieving programs would be at all optimized for something like that, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
2×3×7×23 Posts |
I've done some testings on Riesel base 633 with a conjectured k=1004, it has by tonight been taken to n=25K, however I need some help on finding out, weather or not the k=64, has to be excluded from further testing (beyond n=25K) or it has to remain in the k's remaining list. Srsieve raised a warning, that k=64 for Riesel base 633, has algebraric factors, however I've never gotten the website used to testing for algebraric factors to work. So can either Gary or Ian tell me weather or not it is composit for all n's for k=64 or it in fact is expected to have a prime eventually?
Btw, consider it reserved, to n=25K, if I want to take it higher I'll let you all know ![]() Regards KEP |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1107 | 2021-07-26 18:37 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2300 | 2021-07-25 07:38 |
| Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1397 | 2021-07-25 07:07 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 905 | 2021-07-18 16:55 |
| Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 1691 | 2021-07-06 18:50 |