mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2010-01-23, 17:42   #133
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22×23×31 Posts
Default Riesel Base 834

Riesel Base 834
Conjectured k = 166
Covering Set = 5, 167
Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 7(7) and k == 1 mod 11(11)

Found Primes: 129k's File attached

Remaining k's:
4*834^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors
9*834^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors
49*834^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors
144*834^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors

Trivial Factor Eliminations: 31k's

Conjecture Proven

Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:15
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-23, 17:50   #134
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

B2416 Posts
Default Riesel Base 849

Riesel Base 849
Conjectured k = 16
Covering Set = 5, 17
Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2) and k == 1 mod 53(53)

Found Primes:
2*849^1-1
6*849^19-1
8*849^1-1
10*849^21-1
12*849^2-1
14*849^4114-1

Remaining k's:
4*849^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors

Conjecture Proven
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-23, 17:59   #135
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22·23·31 Posts
Default Riesel Base 859

Riesel Base 859
Conjectured k = 44
Covering Set = 5, 43
Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2) and k == 1 mod 3(3) and k == 1 mod 11(11) and k == 1 mod 13(13)

Found Primes: 11k's File attached

Remaining k's:
26*859^n-1

Trivial Factor Eliminations: 9k's

Base Released

Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:15
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-23, 18:05   #136
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22×23×31 Posts
Default Riesel Base 879

Riesel Base 879
Conjectured k = 34
Covering Set = 5, 11
Trivial Factors k == 1 mod 2(2) and k == 1 mod 439(439)

Found Primes: 14k's File attached

Remaining k's: Tested to n=25K
4*879^n-1 <------ Proven composite by partial algebraic factors
24*879^n-1

Base Released

Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:15
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-23, 18:08   #137
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22×23×31 Posts
Default

Reserving Riesel Bases 939, 949, 964, 969, 984

This is the last of b = 4 mod 5 algebraic factors that I have done
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-24, 03:47   #138
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101×103 Posts
Default

Batalov sent me full results file on all of his bases. Here is some additional detail to add to his Sierp base 961 status in the Email that I posted above:

R1021 is at n=50K; released
S1002 is at n=27.7K; released

Here is the additional base 961 prime that had not yet been posted in the forum:
346*961^30374+1 is prime

He no longer has any bases > 500 reserved.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-01-24 at 03:48
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-24, 11:17   #139
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

242438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
Reserving Riesel Bases 939, 949, 964, 969, 984

This is the last of b = 4 mod 5 algebraic factors that I have done
Don't forget Riesel base 799. It shouldn't be too bad.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-24, 11:52   #140
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22·23·31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Don't forget Riesel base 799. It shouldn't be too bad.
With a conjecture k of 1,885,767,686,976 it should only take me an hour or so to complete (if I don't test it above n=1). Your Excel spreadsheet formula will have a hard time finding the partial algebraic factors anyway. Maybe we can have a race to see who gets there first. Just kidding.
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-24, 12:11   #141
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101000101000112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
With a conjecture k of 1,885,767,686,976 it should only take me an hour or so to complete (if I don't test it above n=1). Your Excel spreadsheet formula will have a hard time finding the partial algebraic factors anyway. Maybe we can have a race to see who gets there first. Just kidding.


And here's the kicker: I bet you can't test it to n=1 in an hour, even if you put all of your machines on it at the same time. For speed, be sure and set no factoring with the -f0 switch. You can even forget about proving the PRPs. (I'm not sure if running at least 2 regular ABC2 PFGW scripts would be faster [one each for k==(0 mod 6) & (2 mod 6)]. Likely not since there's so many other trivial k's.)

Better yet, I'll give you a day with all of your machines and you still don't have to prove the PRPs. Just divide the k-value by 50 or whatever # of cores you have and split them up that way just like you'd do different P-ranges while sieveing.

Good luck!

Edit: I got to k=1M in just a few mins. of course that's < 1 one-millionth of the entire k-range. :-)


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-01-24 at 12:13
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-24, 13:31   #142
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

17×251 Posts
Default

I wonder what would be the fastest way to go about doing something like that...my initial impression would be that sieving might be a good thing to do, since the numbers are so plentiful that anything where you look at them one at a time would be terribly slow, and so small that they might be easily TFd (or proven prime by TF).
I doubt any current sieving programs would be at all optimized for something like that, though.
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-24, 14:09   #143
KEP
Quasi Admin Thing
 
KEP's Avatar
 
May 2005

2×3×7×23 Posts
Default

I've done some testings on Riesel base 633 with a conjectured k=1004, it has by tonight been taken to n=25K, however I need some help on finding out, weather or not the k=64, has to be excluded from further testing (beyond n=25K) or it has to remain in the k's remaining list. Srsieve raised a warning, that k=64 for Riesel base 633, has algebraric factors, however I've never gotten the website used to testing for algebraric factors to work. So can either Gary or Ian tell me weather or not it is composit for all n's for k=64 or it in fact is expected to have a prime eventually?

Btw, consider it reserved, to n=25K, if I want to take it higher I'll let you all know

Regards

KEP
KEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes KEP Conjectures 'R Us 1107 2021-07-26 18:37
Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 2300 2021-07-25 07:38
Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 1397 2021-07-25 07:07
Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 905 2021-07-18 16:55
Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes Siemelink Conjectures 'R Us 1691 2021-07-06 18:50

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:04.


Tue Jul 27 09:04:31 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 3:33, 0 users, load averages: 2.27, 1.69, 1.59

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.