![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Dec 2008
83310 Posts |
I was looking through some tables of Laplace Transforms on f(t) the other day, and I noticed that in all cases, as
I suspect that the answer is "no", but if anyone has some attempt at a proof I would appreciate it (my idea would be to use Post's inversion formula and utilizing the Grunwald-Letnikov differintegral for evaluating |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Dec 2008
72·17 Posts |
Quote:
Well, I managed to finally prove it. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help with laplace transform | pinnn | Information & Answers | 4 | 2018-03-27 02:34 |
| mi64: inverse does not exist | wreck | NFS@Home | 1 | 2016-05-08 15:44 |
| Lurid Obsession with Mod Inverse | only_human | Miscellaneous Math | 26 | 2012-08-10 02:47 |
| Inverse of functions | Raman | Math | 5 | 2011-04-13 23:29 |
| Different word sizes/accuracy for forward/inverse transform? | Dresdenboy | Math | 2 | 2003-12-29 22:55 |