![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jan 2010
germany
2×13 Posts |
Hello,
My conjecture is : Let a is an element from (1) --> (2) This means, that if (1) is true, than is (2) also true. It is easy to show that ? My idea to do this with When and therefore: - But the only solution to this is 1: --> -> So I have searched with google many sites, but could not find the answer to this "problem". I hope that anybody can help me with the conjecture. kind regards, sascha |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
This should be posted in the GIMPS forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jan 2010
germany
2×13 Posts |
ok. thanks.
I will post this in the gimps->math Forum |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Mersenne Conjecture | ATH | Math | 26 | 2021-07-01 16:39 |
| Use of new Mersenne conjecture ? | bhelmes | Number Theory Discussion Group | 0 | 2017-07-28 20:34 |
| Conjecture prime numbers, demonstration possible? | Godzilla | Miscellaneous Math | 5 | 2016-05-16 12:44 |
| Mersenne Conjecture | sascha77 | Math | 15 | 2010-05-08 00:33 |
| The New Mersenne Conjecture | Dougy | Math | 32 | 2008-10-26 07:17 |