![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Apr 2003
California
22×23 Posts |
My iteration time is consistently 0.118 s for the 10M DCs that I am doing now: 866 MHz P3 Windows XP Professional.
I stop Prime95 before running Norton AntiVirus 2003: the home version not the Corporate version. That lets NAV finish sooner. When I start Prime95 again, the iteration times slow down to 0.120 s, and they stay slower till I reboot. Don't know why? Suggestion: reboot the PC after a virus scan. You lose a few minutes while rebooting, but these will eventually be paid back in faster iteration times. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Sep 2002
2·331 Posts |
Perhaps you could have Prime95 pause itself when Norton Antivirus 2003 is running then it will unpause when Norton exits.
From the undoc.txt In rare cases, users have reported the program can interfere with the performance of some programs such as disk defragmenters and some games. You can pause prime95 automatically when these programs are running by adding this line to prime.ini: PauseWhileRunning=prog1,prog2,prog3,etc Note that prime95 will pause if the program name matches any part of the running program's file name. That is "foobar" will match "c:\foobar.exe", "C:\FOOBAR\name.exe", and even "C:\myfoobarprog.exe". By default, prime95 will check the list of running programs every 64 iterations, but not more frequently than every 10 seconds. You can adjust the time period with this prime.ini setting: PauseCheckInterval=n where n is the number of seconds between checking which programs are running. Maybe Norton AV leaves some small program (process) running in the background that is consuming the extra time. If you find out what processes are running before starting Norton then after you exit it, any leftover/new process will be identified. ( Process is a program, with Win 2000 and XP there is the Windows Task Manager that can show all the processes, with 95,98,ME a program like ATM can show them.) You can boost Prime95s priority slightly to compensate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Aug 2002
21D216 Posts |
Or, you could toss Norton into the trash...
The best "anti-virus software" is common sense... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Sep 2003
1010000111102 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Aug 2002
Dawn of the Dead
111010112 Posts |
I can agree with that, but some of us work extensively through the emails ... a worker in Chile read one of my papers, asked a few questions through the mail and then asked for comments on his data ... slorton stopped an infected spreadsheet cold ...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Aug 2002
London, UK
5·19 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Your point is well made, but a safety net like Norton/Symantec antivirus (frequently updated, of course) is also essential.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Runs Prime95 on Raspberry Pi | primeawesome | Hardware | 6 | 2018-02-14 08:19 |
| PFGW runs slower than usual | carpetpool | Information & Answers | 4 | 2017-11-22 15:34 |
| Who runs prime95 ECM? | hj47 | Software | 3 | 2009-10-07 15:21 |
| Is mprime significantly slower than Prime95? | abcd | Linux | 9 | 2007-08-31 14:26 |
| anybody notice if 22.9 runs a hair slower than 22.8 | crash893 | Software | 2 | 2002-09-14 05:02 |