![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
3,541 Posts |
ArXiv paper
Many have noticed that the linear algebra problem produced by the heavy-duty factoring algorithms behaves strangely when the problem size increases, and that it becomes impossible to solve if you are not careful. These guys actually analyze sparse Gauss elimination as a thermodynamic problem and work out thresholds beyond which Gauss elimination becomes hard. In particular, their work has implications for NFS filtering. Unfortunately they work on a simplified version of the full problem, and it isn't obvious after a quick reading that there's anything here that msieve can use. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
Quote:
about sparse Gaussian elimination in order to implement filtering. I found that the clique methods developed by CWI produced better results, so now I use their code instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
DD516 Posts |
Those clique methods are a prelude to the merge phase, which looks exactly like Gauss elimination even in CWI's code. (More details in my CADO slides). So the results above could still be relevant.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Resume linear algebra | Timic | Msieve | 35 | 2020-10-05 23:08 |
| Linear algebra at 600% | CRGreathouse | Msieve | 8 | 2009-08-05 07:25 |
| Linear algebra crashes | 10metreh | Msieve | 3 | 2009-02-02 08:34 |
| Linear algebra proof | Damian | Math | 8 | 2007-02-12 22:25 |
| Linear algebra in MPQS | R1zZ1 | Factoring | 2 | 2007-02-02 06:45 |