mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-09-11, 16:15   #1904
TheJudger
 
TheJudger's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Mar 2005
Germany

11·101 Posts
Default

Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by frmky View Post
My poor S1070.
no, the situation is not that bad. The current development (0.20) does not run very well (slow performance) on CC 1.x GPUs iff sieving is done on GPU.
There will be new kernels in mfaktc 0.20 and depending on the factor size (above 276) you'll notice a performance improvement even on CC 1.x GPUs.
So the questions/suggestions are more about how much effort should be spent on CC 1.x GPUs? Currently I don't plan to drop support on CC 1.x GPUs but I don't spent much time on optimizations for CC 1.x, got the idea?
I was thinking about disabling GPU sieving on CC 1.x GPUs (just because it runs slow), this will save some time during testing.

Oliver
P.S. thank you George and rcv for GPU sieving, thank you George for the new kernels
TheJudger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-12, 07:56   #1905
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

113238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJudger View Post
P.S. thank you George and rcv for GPU sieving, thank you George for the new kernels
Thank you Oliver for not dropping cc 1.3

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-09-14, 17:27   #1906
aketilander
 
aketilander's Avatar
 
"Åke Tilander"
Apr 2011
Sandviken, Sweden

2·283 Posts
Default Resume from chekpoint file with mfaktc 0.19

I have a question, which maybe not is a big issue, but anyway:
A HDD was smoked on one of my systems, but happily I was able to rescue the intermediary results from mfaktc 0.19 from the old hard drive. I was happy because I am doing some work for Operation Billion Digits high up between ^85 and ^86.
Now I have installed a new disk and Windows fresh from the beginning on that disk.
When I tried to resume from last checkpoint-file mfaktc 0.19 refuses me to resume and insists that I should begin trial factoring from the beginning. This would mean that I would loose a couple of weeks of work, so I wonder if there is a way to resume?

Sorry, I just looked at the content of the checkpoint files and there are only blank spaces, no real content. So the old Hard disk was in a worse state then I thought! Nothing to do then, sorry for taking your time.

Last fiddled with by aketilander on 2012-09-14 at 18:02
aketilander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-10-06, 19:58   #1907
c10ck3r
 
c10ck3r's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Kansas

22316 Posts
Default

My Pentium D 940 CPU can't feed my GTX 460 fully. I can get 24 Ghz-Days/day running 24/7 instead of however many it should get (~120).
c10ck3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-10-06, 21:50   #1908
TheJudger
 
TheJudger's Avatar
 
"Oliver"
Mar 2005
Germany

45716 Posts
Default

c10ck3r: I guess the poor performance is related to the relative small L1 cache size. You'll like mfaktc 0.20 once it is finished.

Oliver

Btw: CPU Launch date Q1'06 vs. Q3'10 GTX 460, this is four and a half year difference...
TheJudger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-10-07, 02:13   #1909
c10ck3r
 
c10ck3r's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Kansas

547 Posts
Default

It is technically my mothers desktop, with my GPU and PSU... This summer I hope to add a desktop of my own...
c10ck3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-10-10, 01:56   #1910
bcp19
 
bcp19's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

10101001112 Posts
Default

I had a similar problem with a Core2Quad and a 480, could not max out the GPU even with all 4 cores running mfaktc. A single core of my 2500 outproduced the entire quad on the 480.
bcp19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-04, 00:40   #1911
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

2·11·109 Posts
Default

Could we please have Prime95-style timestamps accompany the results? That would be quite useful!

Edit: Never mind, I found out that I can configure it in mfaktc.ini.

Last fiddled with by ixfd64 on 2012-11-04 at 01:36
ixfd64 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-04, 01:17   #1912
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

1,123 Posts
Default

I would also like to see the option to do sieve on the GPU only like mmff. How hard is that?
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-04, 02:26   #1913
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

342710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flashjh View Post
I would also like to see the option to do sieve on the GPU only like mmff. How hard is that?
Oliver's post from 2 months ago seems to indicate it's planned for inclusion in mfaktc v0.20, and presumably working (at least in alpha form) at that time.
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-04, 02:31   #1914
flashjh
 
flashjh's Avatar
 
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA

1,123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
Oliver's post from 2 months ago seems to indicate it's planned for inclusion in mfaktc v0.20, and presumably working (at least in alpha form) at that time.
That's right, I forgot. I know it won't be as fast, but it will be nice to use the CPU for something else.
flashjh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mfakto: an OpenCL program for Mersenne prefactoring Bdot GPU Computing 1676 2021-06-30 21:23
The P-1 factoring CUDA program firejuggler GPU Computing 753 2020-12-12 18:07
gr-mfaktc: a CUDA program for generalized repunits prefactoring MrRepunit GPU Computing 32 2020-11-11 19:56
mfaktc 0.21 - CUDA runtime wrong keisentraut Software 2 2020-08-18 07:03
World's second-dumbest CUDA program fivemack Programming 112 2015-02-12 22:51

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:21.


Fri Aug 6 08:21:51 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 2:50, 1 user, load averages: 2.80, 2.44, 2.33

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.